Sunitaben vs Appearance
Judges:
27 March, 2012·Heard learned advocate Ms. Tejal K. Shah for the appellant. Admit.Learned advocate Ms. Shah seeks permission to delete respondent No. 4. Permission to delete respondent No. 4 is granted.Learned advocate Mr. Bhagel states that he has instruction to appear on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 to 6 and shall...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manharbhai vs Deputy
Judges:
27 March, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed to quash and set aside the impugned award dated 28.02.2011 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Anand in Reference Case [L.C.A.] No. 280/1998, whereby the said reference was rejected.2. The facts in brief are that the petitioner was serving a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Urvashidevi vs None For
Judges:
27 March, 2012·At the request made by learned advocate Mr.J. V. Bhairavia for the appellant to enable him to take instructions and to file affidavit, the matter is adjourned to 10th April 2012. He has stated that it has processed upto higher level and, therefore, sometime may be granted.[ RAJESH H. SHUKLA, J. ] vi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Balubhai vs Rule Served For
Judges:
27 March, 2012·As some of the respondents have expired and endorsement shows some of the respondents are unserved expired, learned AGP is directed to take necessary steps for filing Civil Applications for bringing the heirs on record. The matter is adjourned to 17th April 2012.[ RAJESH H. SHUKLA, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Civil Application No. ... vs Unknown
Judges:
27 March, 2012·#. There is a note for speaking to minutes. Mr.Pathak states that the last paragraph of the order dated 11/7/2001 passed in Special Civil Application No.5179 of 2001 is required to be deleted.#. In the facts and circumstances of the case, therefore, in the original order dated 11/7/2001 the last par...
High Court Of Gujarat
Misc.Civil Application No. 249 Of ... vs Government Pleader For
Judges:
27 March, 2012·The grievance made by the applicant in the present application is that though the High Court had directed the opponents to place the applicant in the Direct Payment Scheme floated by the opponents, the said direction is not complied with by the opponents. Mr. A.Y.Kogje, learned A.G.P. has produced a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Criminal Appeal No. 927 Of 2 vs Unknown
Judges:
27 March, 2012·This appeal was time barred by 27 days. Misc. Criminal Application No.2136 of 2001 to condone the delay of 27 days in filing this appeal late is already dismissed today by separate order. Thus, this appeal is required to be dismissed as having become time barred. On merits also it cannot be said tha...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manharbhai vs State
Judges:
27 March, 2012·Issue notice returnable on 5.4.2012.Learned APP waives service on behalf of the State.Direct service is permitted qua the private respondent.(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Kotadia
Judges:
27 March, 2012·1.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. This is an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, at the instance of the insurer of the vehicle which is allegedly involved in the accident in question.2.The appellant challenges herein the order dated March 30, 2001 passed by the Mot...
High Court Of Gujarat
Saurashtra vs State
Judges:
27 March, 2012·Shri Jasani, learned advocate appearing for petitioners has placed on record the affidavit-in-rejoinder to further affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent. Learned AGP Ms. Vishen seeks time to receive instructions in this behalf and file further affidavit by way of sur-sur-rejoinder, if required. At ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.