Kankaria vs Laljibhai
Judges:
26 June, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :-[A] Be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 13.09.2011 passed below Exh.10 in the interest of justice.[B] Pending ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Abdulbhai vs State
Judges:
26 June, 2012·1. The instant application is filed seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Thara Police Station, District-Banaskantha C.R. No. I-9/2012 pertaining to the offences punishable under Sections 452, 326, 324, 323, 504, 336, 506(2), 427, 114 of the IPC.2. Mr. Ansari,...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kusumben vs Sardar
Judges:
26 June, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :-"[a] To allow this petition and issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, direction or order in the nature of writ, as may be deemed to be appropriate, quashing and setting aside the action of the respondent Bank to ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Land vs Santokben
Judges:
26 June, 2012·Heard learned advocates for the parties.It has been the consistent practice of this Court not to enter into the merits of those appeals wherein the claim in appeal is petty, and claims upto Rs.1,00,000/- have been quantified by this Court as petty claims. Since the amount involved in these appeals i...
High Court Of Gujarat
Zaiuddin vs Mohmmad
Judges:
26 June, 2012·1. The present application u/s.5 of the Limitation Act has been preferred by the applicant herein - original defendant to condone the delay of 14 days in preferring the Civil Revision Application.2. Having heard Mr.Kashyap Joshi, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant and Mr.P.M.Lakha...
High Court Of Gujarat
Baroda vs Unknown
Judges:
26 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) It is an undisputed position that against the order which is the basis of the present petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred being Letters Patent Appeal No.766 of 2012 and the same has been admitted and as stated...
High Court Of Gujarat
Govindbhai vs State
Judges:
26 June, 2012·Mr.S.V. Raju, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. B.S. Raju, learned Advocate for the applicant, at the outset, states that the applicant has filed quashing petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. being Cr.M.A.No. 5990 of 2012 and in that matter, the stay has been granted, and thereafter, seeks time....
High Court Of Gujarat
Patel Shivrambhai Ishvarlal vs Chief Controlling Revenue Authority
Judges: K M Thaker
26 June, 2012·Heard Ms. Kapadia, learned advocate for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has brought under challenge the order dated 21.4.2011 passed by the appellate authority in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 53A of the Bombay Stamp Act. The petitioner has prayed, inter alia, that:-“9B. Be ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhakulaben Maheshbhai Shantilal Bhatt & 3
Judges: Jayant Patel, C L Soni
26 June, 2012·IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADFIRST APPEAL No. 2303 of 2008WithCROSS OBJECTION NO.109 OF 2012For Approval and Signature:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL Sd/-HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.L. SONI Sd/-========================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vasantaben Somabhai Rathod & 8 Opponents
Judges: M R Shah
26 June, 2012·1.0 Present Civil Revision Application under Section 29 (2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Houses Rent (Control) Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “Bombay Rent Act”) has been preferred by the petitioners herein original plaintiffs to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and de...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.