Vinodrai vs State
Judges:
27 June, 2012·1.0 By way of present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief/s:7.a.Your Lordships be pleased to quash and set aside the Orders annexed at Annexure A hereinbefore to the present petition and (i) Order No. Ijar/Makam/84-08/4580 to 88 dated April 13, 2010 ( 13.04.2010) by which the pe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhimjibhai vs Umaben
Judges:
27 June, 2012·The present Second Appeal is of the year 1986. Today, when the present Second Appeal is taken up for final hearing, Shri Mehul Shah, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant has stated at the bar that he is not receiving any further instruction from the appellant, who was aged 88 years ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sanjay vs Kutbuddin
Judges:
27 June, 2012·As the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the appellants was elevated to the Bench of this Court and thereafter has expired, Registry is directed to ISSUE FRESH NOTICE upon the appellants, making it returnable on 23rd July, 2012 informing the appellants that they are required to make alternativ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manuba vs State
Judges:
27 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Petition was not pressed at this stage with a view to making and pursuing appropriate representation independently, including the representation at Annexure-C of the petition. Learned counsel also fairly conceded that the grievance or demand of the petitione...
High Court Of Gujarat
Salat vs Sugrobibi
Judges:
27 June, 2012·This application is a classic example of sheer lethargy and inaction on part of the petitioners who have preferred this Misc. Application seeking inter alia condonation of delay u/s. 5 of Limitation Act . It would be appropriate to briefly state the chronology of events which culminated in preferrin...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dhiraj vs State
Judges:
27 June, 2012·[1] Heard learned advocates for the respective parties.[2] It is submitted by learned APP that charge is framed and 30.06.2012 is fixed for recording evidence of complainant.[3] If trial is not completed within a period of 9(nine) months, in that event, the applicant will be at liberty to file fresh...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nagabhai vs The
Judges:
27 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. DESAI)1. By way of present appeal, the appellants have challenged the judgment and order dated 29.6.2006 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Patan in Sessions Case No.73 of 2005 by which the accused persons were convicted for Section 302 read with Section 34 of Indian...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Appearance
Judges:
27 June, 2012·The present Appeal, under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is filed by the appellant - State of Gujarat against the Judgment and order dated 29.2.1996 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Junagadh, in Sessions Case No. 135 of 1994, whereby the learned Judge has acquitted the re...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs None For
Judges:
27 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA)1. The petitioner has sought to challenge order dated 3.12.2011 of the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Narmada Yojna, Vadodara-2, whereby the application of the petitioner made under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, "the Act") is r...
High Court Of Gujarat
Karmanbhai vs Unknown
Judges:
27 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) Learned advocate for the appellant wants time to make available the relevant evidence for perusal of this Court at the time for admission hearing.S.O.to 11th July, 2012.(RAVI R.TRIPATHI, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) (ashish) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.