Devji vs Irshadali
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Rule.Mr. Mehul Sharad Shah, learned advocate, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent NO.2.Heard learned advocates for the parties.Learned advocate for the opponent No.2 however submits that the nature of amendment and prayer clause would travel beyond the relief claimed in the main appeal.Co...
High Court Of Gujarat
Letters Patent Appeal No. 1301 Of ... vs Mr Ketan A Dave For
Judges:
15 June, 2012·(Per : HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT) 1.The appellant in these two appeals is the Food Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as the "Corporation"). The Corporation challenges the common judgment & order dated 22nd September, 1997 passed by learned Single Judge in Special Civil Applications...
High Court Of Gujarat
United vs Dalsing
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Leave to amend the prayer clause.Issue NOTICE to proposed heirs of the respondent No.4, in each of the applications, making it returnable on 6th July, 2012.[M.R.SHAH, J.] rafik Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Tax Appeal No. 181 Of 2004 vs Unknown
Judges:
15 June, 2012·(Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA) 1Heard Mr.Pranav G.Desai, learned Standing Counsel for the Appellant-Revenue.2The Tribunal has recorded findings of fact after appreciating evidence on record and hence no question of law, much less a substantial question of law can be said to arise out of the im...
High Court Of Gujarat
Civil Application No. 3863 Of 2003 vs Unknown
Judges:
15 June, 2012·(Per : HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT) This Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been preferred by the applicant-appellant for condonation of delay of 339 days. The impugned judgment and order was passed on 16th January, 2002. Application for certified copy thereof was made on 11th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajeshkumar Subhodbhai Shah vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Pursuant to the notice issued by the Court, respondent No. 2 Satishchandra Ratilal Bhagat, Food Inspector, is present before the Court. He states that learned A.P.P. Ms. Shah is going to represent him.In view of above, S.O. to 22.6.2012.(BANKIM N. MEHTA, J) (pkn)...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mill vs District
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Since the application pertains to fixing early date of final hearing of Special Civil Application No.5095/2004 and, as the Roster for final hearing has not been assigned to this Court, the Registry may list the application before the appropriate Court.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) Gaurav+ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Civil Application No. ... vs Government Pleader For
Judges:
15 June, 2012·(Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE) Learned advocate Mr. Pardiwala appearing for respondent No. 3 has submitted that as there were vacancies in the cadre of Judges and ministerial staff in the Labour Courts, respondent No. 3 had sent a proposal for filling up the vacancies. The said proposal was for...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Civil Application No. ... vs Mrs Kanan R Shah For Petitioner No
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Mr.Chauhan, learned advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No.1. He has tendered affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of respondent No.1 today. Mr.Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner prays that he may be required some time. S.O. to 18th January, 2005. Meanwhile, Mr.Shah assured that he will ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Padmakant vs Appearance
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Present application has been preferred by the applicant - original respondent No.1 / plaintiff to modify order dtd.9/5/2011 passed in Special Civil Application No. 5156 of 2011 and to give further appropriate direction to the opponent No.1 to restore the possession of the applicant on the suit land....
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.