Biovascular vs Registrar
Judges:
19 June, 2012·There appears to be a mistake in the manner in which the petition is depicted on the board, inasmuch as Mr.Vishwas K. Shah, learned advocate is shown to be appearing for the petitioner and respondent, both. In fact, Mr.Y.V. Vaghela, learned advocate is appearing for the respondent. Registry may corr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Natwarbhai vs Special
Judges:
19 June, 2012·Though rule is served on the respondents, nobody appears. Hence, this application seeking leave to file appeal is allowed. Rule is made absolute.(M.D.SHAH,J.) radhan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jhaveri vs Unknown
Judges:
19 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) While admitting the appeal on 18.9.2000, following question of law was raised :"Whether, the appellant was manufacturing an article or thing and therefore was entitled to Section 80IA relief?"Assessee claims benefit of deduction under section 80IA of the In...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhagwanjibhai vs Legal
Judges:
19 June, 2012·Considering the decision of the full Bench of this Court in the case of Prabhashankar Shankarlal Joshi & Ors. Vs. Sulsinhji Kesharisinhji Parmar reported in 1984 GLH 662, Shri Jay Thakkar, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application as i...
High Court Of Gujarat
Munir vs State
Judges:
19 June, 2012·1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing the FIR being CR.No.II-3241/2012 registered with Odhav Police Station, Ahmedabad, on the grounds stated in the application.2....
High Court Of Gujarat
Sadeka vs State
Judges:
19 June, 2012·The present Application has been filed by the Applicant under Articles 14, 19, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for direction as prayed for in the Application regarding registering the complaint.Heard learned Advocate Mr. Nasir Saiyed for the Applicant as well as learned APP Mr. H.L.Jani...
High Court Of Gujarat
Great vs Union
Judges:
19 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) One week's time is allowed to learned advocate Ms.Amee Yajnik for the respondent to file the affidavit-in-reply and thereafter, 3 days time is allowed to learned advocate for the petitioner to file the affidavit-in-rejoinder. S.O. to 02.07.2012 We have not p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Praveenben vs State
Judges:
19 June, 2012·Rule returnable on 08.11.2012.(K.S.Jhaveri,J.) sid/-Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.