Anand vs Dhirubhai
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Heard Mr.D.G. Chauhan, learned advocate for the petitioner. It is stated by him that respondent No.1 has not completed 240 days in the calender year and has not pleaded before the Labour Court that there is a violation of the provisions of Sections 25-G and 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947....
High Court Of Gujarat
Ranjitsingh vs State
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Learned counsel, Mr.Majmudar has stated that learned counsel, Mr.Puj for the respondent no.2 wants time and he has no objection. Therefore, the matter is adjourned to 18 th July, 2012.Interim relief granted earlier to continue till then.(RAJESH H.SHUKLA, J.) /patil Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Yashinsha vs State
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Rule.MR.Nanavati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of Rule for the respondent-State.Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf both the sides , so also considering the relevant papers annexed with this application and more particularly, wedding card and further the fact ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Executive vs Bakulaben
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the petitioner. Though served, none appears for respondents.The petitioner-original employer in Reference No. 385 of 1999 has approached this Court with following reliefs:"that the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to admit and allow this petition;that the Hon'ble Court may be ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajeshbhai vs State
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Heard Mr.Tarak Damani, learned advocate for the applicant and Mr.Maulik Nanavati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.The instant application is filed seeking temporary bail for the period of 45 days in connection with FIR being I- C.R. No.78/2011 registered with Manjalpur ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sri vs Union
Judges:
20 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Issue notice returnable on 3.7.2012. Pendency of this petition will not stand in the way of the Customs authorities in assessing the goods imported by the petitioner in accordance with law.Direct service for respondent Nos.2 and 3 is permitted.[V.M. SAHAI, J...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shaileshbhai vs State
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Rule.Learned APP Miss Shah waives service of notice of Rule for the respondent State.2. By this application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "the Code"), the applicant has sought bail in connection with the offence registered as I - C.R. No.60 of 2012 before Umara...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sun vs M/S
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?To be referred to the Reporter or not ?Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Lakhubhai vs State
Judges:
20 June, 2012·LAKHUBHAI NATHUBHAI MADHAVI - Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance :MR PP MAJMUDAR for Petitioner(s) : 1, MR SHAKTI S JADEJA for Petitioner(s) : 1, MR PRANAV DAVE AGP for Respondent(s) : 1, NOTICE SERVED BY DS ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.