1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Anand vs Dhirubhai

High Court Of Gujarat|20 June, 2012
Heard Mr.D.G. Chauhan, learned advocate for the petitioner. It is stated by him that respondent No.1 has not completed 240 days in the calender year and has not pleaded before the Labour Court that there is a violation of the provisions of Sections 25-G and 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. However, the Labour Court has come to a finding that juniors have been retained after termination of the petitioner for unauthorizedly absent for work.
Issue Notice, returnable on 23.07.2012.
They shall be no stay regarding the reinstatement of the petitioner. However, the payment of 10% back-wages and continuity of service and consequential benefits, as awarded by the impugned award, shall remain stayed till then.
Abhilasha Kumari, J.) rakesh/ Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.

Anand vs Dhirubhai


High Court Of Gujarat

20 June, 2012