Heirs vs Tensile
Judges:
26 June, 2012·NOTICE to the petitioners returnable on 16.07.2012.Sd/-[R.M.CHHAYA, J ] *** Bhavesh* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dhanubha vs State
Judges:
26 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Learned counsel Mr. Shah, appearing for the petitioner, submitted that in view of the pendency of the another petition of the petitioner being Special Civil Application No. 8157 of 2012, the present petition was not pressed at this stage. Accordingly, it is ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pushpendrasinh vs State
Judges:
26 June, 2012·Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both the sides, no ground is made out for temporary bail and hence dismissed.(J.C.UPADHYAYA, J.) * Pansala.Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mulubhai vs State
Judges:
26 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present application is filed by the convict through jail seeking temporary bail for a period of 45 days for agricultural operations.Rule.Learned APP, Mr.Patel, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent-State.Learned APP invited attention of the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ushaben vs State
Judges:
26 June, 2012·1. Mr.Chintan S. Popat learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner supplied a copy of the order dated 26.04.2012 passed by the competent authority of Nagar Prathmik Sikshan Samiti, Amreli and submitted that in view of the said order, these petitions shall not survive.2. In view of the abov...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Unknown
Judges:
26 June, 2012·1. RULE.Mr. Nikhil S. Kariel, learned advocate for the opponent waives service of Rule on behalf of the opponent.2. Considering the issue involved in this application and with consent of learned advocates appearing for the parties, this application is taken up for final disposal forthwith.3. Conside...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ranjitsinh vs State
Judges:
26 June, 2012·Rule.Ms.Pathak, learned AGP appears and waives service of rule for respondent - State.The instant application is filed seeking temporary bail for 30 days as wife of detenu is suffering from acute appendicitis and as per the medical certificate, she requires surgery.Having considered the submissions ...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Appearance
Judges:
26 June, 2012·The present Appeal, under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is filed by the appellant - State of Gujarat against the Judgment and order dated 1.9.1995 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.15, City Sessions Court, Ahmedabad, in Sessions Case No. 151 of 1991, whereby the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayesh vs State
Judges:
26 June, 2012·1. Mr.N.D.Nanavati, learned Sr. Counsel with Mr. M.R.Yagnik, learned advocate for he applicant states that the applicant is in Jail since 27th November, 2009 and for one or another reason, the Sessions case is pending before the concerned Sessions Court & is not proceeding further. He, therefore, se...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vepar vs Arjunji
Judges:
26 June, 2012·Learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to delete respondent no.3. Permission is granted.Learned advocate for the respondent no.1.2.1 to 1.2.5 is not present. In the interest of justice, S.O. to 9.7.2012. It is clarified that if the learned advocate for respondent is not present on the n...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.