Executive vs Jayaben
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Considering the averments made in the application, this application is allowed. Delay caused in filing first appeal is condoned. Rule is made absolute.First Appeal be listed for admission on 6.7.2012.( M.D.Shah, J ) srilatha Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kalsingbhai vs State
Judges:
03 July, 2012·When the matter is called out, none is present for the applicant. Learned APP has submitted that in view of the fact that the prisoner applicant had misused the earlier leave and absconded for long time of 4042 days, this application may not be entertained.The court is of the view that the tendency ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Popatbhai vs District
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Heard.The amendment sought by way of this application cannot be granted since they pertain to events that have taken place subsequent to the filing of the captioned petition in the year 2000. It shall be open to the petitioner to file substantive petition. Hence, this application is not entertained ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mukeshbhai vs Comissioner
Judges:
03 July, 2012·This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 21.1.2012 passed by respondent No.1, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short "the Act") by detaining the detenue as a "bootlegger" as defined under Sectio...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gangaba vs State
Judges:
03 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR) Learned counsel for the applicants requested to delete respondent Nos.2, 4 and 8, as according to him, they are not necessary parties in this proceedings.Said respondents are permitted to be deleted at the cost and risk of the applicants. Cause title to be ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharatiben vs Pratik
Judges:
03 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) The corpus is before us. The corpus states that she and respondent No.1 have informally married though not legally being minor. Her relationship with respondent No.1 was known to her parents which was not objected to for a period of about three years. The corpu...
High Court Of Gujarat
Saiyad vs Najarali
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Rule has not received back. Matter is adjourned to 12th July 2012.(Ms.Sonia Gokani,J.) Deepak* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Naveen vs Indian
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Notice returnable on 11.07.2012. Any promotion given will be subject to the result of this petition.Direct Service is permitted today.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Balaji
Judges:
03 July, 2012·[1] Heard learned advocates for the respective parties. It is submitted by learned advocate for the applicant herein - New Indian Assurance Company that the applicant has already deposited entire decreetal amount with proportionate costs and interest i.e. Rs.7,28,586/- with the Trial Court.[2] Havin...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.