Bhaishankar vs Majoor
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Leave to join Liquidator of respondent No.1-Bank as party-respondent, is granted.Cause title be amended forthwith.Issue notice to the newly joined party-respondent returnable on 26.7.2012.Direct service is permitted.(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Mr Jitendra M Patel For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Respondent No.1 was working as accountant with the petitioner at the relevant time. As per section 2(G) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, the opponent No.1 had filed application No.278/81 before the opponent No.2, Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act. The petitioner company al...
High Court Of Gujarat
Champakbhai vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present application is filed by the convict through jail seeking temporary bail for a period of 30 days so as to undertake agriculture operations.Rule.Learned APP,Mr.Pujari, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent-State.Learned APP invited att...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Unserved For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Ms.Purnima Sheth, Ld.Advocate for Mr.B.N.Doctor, for the petitioner seeks permission to delete the name of Respondent No.1, who is the driver of the vehicle in question. Ms.Megha Jani, ld.Advocate for Respondent no.3 has no objection if the request as aforesaid is granted. Hence the petitioner is pe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mrs. Ami Yagnik Ld.Asst.Public ...
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Rule. Ld. Government Counsel Mrs. Ami Yagnik waives the service of rule for the Respondent State. Upon hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, it appears that, in the facts and circumstances of the case the present petition requires a recognition.The glaring fac...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dushyantbhai vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·The present application has been preferred seeking temporary bail for a period of 30 days in connection with I-C.R. No.258/2010 registered with Dabhoda Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465 & 467 IPC. This application has been preferred by the applicant, through his mot...
High Court Of Gujarat
Padmaben vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) Learned advocate Mr.Abhiraj R.Trivedi for the applicant seeks permission to delete respondent No.2- Police Inspector, Channi Police Station, Vadodara. He states that he was impleaded as party respondent under misconception. The request is granted. Respon...
High Court Of Gujarat
Yunuskhan vs Intelligence
Judges:
16 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) It is reported that learned Advocate for the respondent no.1 - Narcotics Control Bureau is not well. On a request made on her behalf, the matter is adjourned to 25.07.2012.(RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) Sunil W. Wagh Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ronak vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Learned advocate Mr. Sakim Saiyed appearing for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw this application.Leave to withdraw this Criminal Misc. Application stands granted. Criminal Misc. Application No.8493 of 2012 stands disposed of, as withdrawn.Rule is discharged with no order as to costs.(MS SONIA ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Motibhai vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)1. The present application is filed by the convict through jail seeking temporary bail for a period of 45 days so as to undertake agricultural operations.2. RULE.Mr. H. K. Patel, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of rule on behalf of the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.