Durgeshkumar vs State
Judges:
18 July, 2012·Notice to the respondents returnable on 6.8.2012. Learned AP Mr. HL Jani waives service of notice for respondent No.1-State.(Rajesh H. Shukla, J.) (hn) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs Chandrakant
Judges:
18 July, 2012·Notice returnable on 31.07.2012.Mr.M.M.Saiyed, learned advocate waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent.[M.D.Shah, J.] satish Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Raju vs Commissioner
Judges:
18 July, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 24.3.2012 passed by respondent No. 1, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short" the Act) by detaining the detenu as a "bootlegger" as defined under Sec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jagdishchandra vs State
Judges:
18 July, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-(A) your Lordships be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, directing respondents authorities to regularize the long service of the petitioner in regular set up of Clerk, and grant all the consequential ben...
High Court Of Gujarat
Champaben vs State
Judges:
18 July, 2012·The applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR being I-C.R. No.39/2012 registered with Chiloda Police Station, Gandhinagar on 3rd May, 2012 for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471, 114 and 120(b) IPC.This is a first application filed by the applicant under Section 4...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ramsingbhai vs State
Judges:
18 July, 2012·The record shows that learned counsel Mr.Nitin Pandya appears for respondent Nos.3/1 to 3/9. However, it has been pointed out at the bar that learned counsel Mr.Pandya is no more practicing advocate in this Court.Hence, fresh notice to respondent Nos.3/1 to 3/9, returnable on 01.08.2012. Over and ab...
High Court Of Gujarat
Khodabhai vs State
Judges:
18 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present application is filed by the convict through jail seeking temporary bail for a period of 60 days so as to get his father operated for cataract.Learned APP invited attention of the Court to jail remarks.In the month of November-December, 2011, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jagruti vs Thro'
Judges:
18 July, 2012·Though served, the respondent no.1 is not represented by anybody. However, learned counsel, Mr.Jehanir Khajotia appearing with learned counsel, Mr.Asifkhan Pathan is present in the Court and has requested to take up the matter. However, interest of justice would be served if the matter is postponed ...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Panchabhai
Judges:
18 July, 2012·Adjournment is requested for by learned advocate for the petitioner on the ground that the respondent No.3 has remained unserved in Special Civil Application No.1270 of 2011. He has also submitted that in Special Civil Application No.2101 of 2011, notice qua respondent Nos.2 and 3 is not received ba...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pratap vs State
Judges:
18 July, 2012·1. The applicant has filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for regular bail in connection with CR.No.II-3721 of 2011 registered with Surat Railway police station for the offences punishable under Sections 8(C), 20(B) and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.2. Learned advocate...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.