Anant vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·At the outset, learned advocates representing the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 submits that in larger family interest and for further peace and harmony the parties have settled the dispute and the complainant Smt.Manjulia Sujit Paul, who is present in the Court and so identified by learned...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmedabad vs B
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA) Challenge in this Appeal filed under Section 411 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 ('BPMC Act', for short) is to the correctness of the judgment and order dated 1st November 1993 rendered in Municipal Valuation Appeal No.6049/1987 by ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Lilaben vs Commissioner
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Heard learned Counsels for the parties.This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 03.12.2009 passed by the respondent No.1 in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (for short the Act ) by detaining the lady d...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmedabad vs Divyang
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA) Challenge in this Appeal filed under Section 411 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 ('BPMC Act', for short) is to the correctness of the judgment and order dated 31st January 1992 rendered in Municipal Valuation Appeal No.17998/1988 by...
High Court Of Gujarat
Balasaheb vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·The present application has been filed by the applicant-accused under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code for regular bail.The applicant-accused is charged with having committed offences under Sections 66(1)(B), 65AE, 115(2) and 81 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, for which, FIR being III-C.R.No.10...
High Court Of Gujarat
M vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Rajkot erred in exercising revisional powers under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 at a belated stage when earlier the parties had given a consent to close the evidence and the learned Magistr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Magankumari vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Mr H.A Dave learned advocate for the applicant and Mr Shakeel A Qureshi learned advocate for respondent No. 2, submit that the matter is settled between the parties and in support thereof my attention is drawn to the affidavit of the respondent No. 2 (original complainant) Annexure B.The perusal of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chandrakantaben vs District
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Heard learned advocate Mr. Ankit Shah with learned advocate Mr. YN Ravani on behalf of petitioner, learned advocate Mr. RK Kothari appearing for respondent no. 2 to 4 and learned AGP Ms. Jirga Zaveri appearing for respondent no. 1.In present petition, petitioner has made prayer in para 10 (A) and (B...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vipul vs Registrar
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Heard learned advocate Mr. DM Devnani on behalf of petitioner, learned AGP Mr. AL Sharma received copy of petition with all annexures from learned advocate Mr. Devnani today. Therefore, he is appearing for respondent state authority.The grievance of present petitioner is that real date of birth of p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Yusuf vs Hasanbhai
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. On the ground that the defendants are not in lawful occupation of the disputed premises, but are trespassers, the petitioner opposed the supply of electricity connection to the suit premises which are in possession and occupation of the defendants. As per the petitioner's allegation, the defendan...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.