At the outset, learned advocates representing the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 submits that in larger family interest and for further peace and harmony the parties have settled the dispute and the complainant Smt.Manjulia Sujit Paul, who is present in the Court and so identified by learned advocate Mr. Amrish Pandya submits that husband of respondent No.2 has taken the responsibility of taking the treatment of their child for the ailment of spinal cord and accordingly the husband has opened an account to be operated jointly by the husband and respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 who is present in the Court submits that she is authorized to operate to aforementioned account so as to meet with medical expenses for the treatment of their child.
The affidavit dated 29th December 2011 is filed by respondent No.2 and accordingly on consideration of overall facts and circumstances and further what is recorded on 20.12.2011 by the concerned police in-charge officer, the impugned complaint deserves to be quashed and set aside and to secure end of justice, I deem it just and proper to quash and set aside the complaint being C.R. No.I-316 of 2010 filed on 3.8.2010 before the Makarpura Police Station, Vadodara City for the offences under Section 498(A), 323, 504, 114 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 7 of Prevention of Dowry Act.
This petition is allowed accordingly.
Direct service is permitted.
[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top