Iffco-Tokio vs Unknown
Judges:
11 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL)1. The present application is preferred for restoration of concerned First Appeal which has been dismissed for non-removal of the Office Objection.2. Considering the facts and circumstances, it appears that vide order dated 13.09.2010, the time was granted t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Indubhai vs State
Judges:
11 January, 2012·Heard Mr.Harshadray A. Dave, learned advocate for the petitioner. It is submitted by him that by order dated 15.06.2011, the Collector has returned the application of the petitioner for presentation before the Competent Authority, without assigning any reason, in spite of the fact that the Collector...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gulam vs State
Judges:
11 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Rule returnable on 21st October, 2010. Mr. K.P. Raval, learned APP waives notice of Rule.State to verify the genuineness of the ground and antecedents of the applicant-convict.[JAYANT PATEL, J.] [H.B.ANTANI, J.] pirzada/-Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Parulben
Judges:
11 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) The learned Counsel for the applicant states that respondents no.4 and 5 had expired, pending the proceedings before the Tribunal and, therefore, they may be permitted to be deleted.Permission granted. Respondents No.4 and 5 shall stand deleted.The present ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dakshin vs Registrar
Judges:
11 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. S.J. MUKHOPADHAYA) This writ petition is preferred by the petitioner for direction on respondents to grant permanent affiliation to the petitioner's college. When the matter was taken up, counsel for the petitioner submitted that another writ petition-S.C.A No...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oriental vs Jayati
Judges:
11 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Since this Appeal is preferred against an order allowing the application made under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act by awarding a sum of Rs.50,000=00 as compensation, the Appeal should be heard before the learned Single Judge....
High Court Of Gujarat
Devusing vs State
Judges:
11 January, 2012·Mr.Shalin N.Mehta, learned advocate for Ms.Vidhi J.Bhatt, learned advocate for the petitioners, submits that the petition has become infructuous, therefore, it may be disposed of as such.Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Notice is discharged.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jubeda vs State
Judges:
11 January, 2012·1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Bhatt for the applicant and learned APP Mr. Raval for respondent no.1-State. None appears for respondent no.2 though served.2. Learned advocate Mr. Bhatt for the applicants took me through the order of the Sessions Court more particularly para-14 of the said order where...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mr Zubin F Bharda For ... vs Coram
Judges:
11 January, 2012·There is a sick note of learned counsel for the petitioner in this case. However, adjourned to 9th February 2012. Interim relief granted earlier to continue till then.[ MOHINDER PAL, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arvind vs State
Judges:
11 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Rule.Mr.Pandya, learned APP waives service of notice of Rule.The present application has been preferred by the applicant - convict for temporary bail on the ground that he wants to find a match for his son's engagement.It appears from the jail that the appl...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.