Devendra vs Jayantilal
Judges:
17 January, 2012·Heard lerned advocate for the applicants.Learned advocate for the applicants submits that the bare allegations in the complaint would reveal that the outstanding dues of Rs.43,38,060/- is pertaining to a sale transaction of cotton seeds oil and no ingredients of Section 406, 420 etc are made out.Iss...
High Court Of Gujarat
Harkishan vs State
Judges:
17 January, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with a view to approach the revisional court against the order passed by the 6th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajkot vide order dated 8.7.2011.Permission granted as prayed for. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gopalbhai vs Appearance
Judges:
17 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed in terms of paragraph 4 (A). Special Civil Application No.4027 of 2010 is restored to file. The writ petition will not be treated as tied up or part heard with this Bench and the office is...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayesh vs State
Judges:
17 January, 2012·Mr.K.P.Raval, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent nos. 1 & 2-State is requested to furnish the information regarding the latest status of investigation. S.O. to 23rd January,2012.(J.C.UPADHYAYA,J.) Girish Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
2 vs Notice Served For Respondent(S)
Judges:
17 January, 2012·RULE returnable on 13th February 2012. Mr.Mehul Sharad Shah, learned advocate waives service of rule for the respondent No.1. Direct service is permitted for respondent No.2.[ C. L. SONI, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jesing vs Nagarbhai
Judges:
17 January, 2012·1. This petition, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, with the following prayers:"(A) To Admit this Special Civil Application.(B) To give the direction to respondents no-2 and 3 to remove the name of respondent no-1 from land of revenue survey no-202/1 paiki 3 ac...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Mr Rc Kodekar
Judges:
17 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Permission is sought to join alleged husband of the corpus, namely, Dhanraj Narsharam Dadaliya, as respondent no.4. Learned counsel, Mr.Parthiv Bhatt submitted that no notice is required to be issued for the proposed additional respondent as the petitioner u...
High Court Of Gujarat
Salvi vs Shakuntlaben
Judges:
17 January, 2012·This appeal has been listed for final hearing on the board of 9th January, 2012 and has been called out for hearing on each day till date. However, at all calls, the learned advocate for the appellants has not bothered to remain present. In the circumstances, the court is left with no option but to ...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Madhu
Judges:
17 January, 2012·Heard.In view of the averments made in the applications, Civil Applications are allowed in terms of para 3 (B) & (C).Office to issue fresh notice to the unserved respondents in the main matters making it returnable on 27.01.2012. Notice may be served upon the unserved respondents as per the prayer m...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.