Aakhja vs State
Judges:
17 January, 2012·1. The present petition is filed by the 100 students of respondent No.3-College and have prayed for the following reliefs:-"(A). Your Lordships be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order and/or direction, and be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 university to per...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pragnesh vs Bipinchandra
Judges:
17 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Rule, returnable on 19.02.2012. Learned advocate Mr.G.M.Joshi waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.1 and learned advocate Mr.Mitul Shelat waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.2.[A.L.DAVE, J.] [MOHINDER PAL, J.] ..mitesh..Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prabhakar vs Mohamed
Judges:
17 January, 2012·Mr.Nayan D. Parekh submits that he wants to file an application to implead a party-respondent, which he will be filing within a week. On that ground he requests for time. Time is granted. The matter is adjourned.(N.V.ANJARIA, J.) [sn devu pps] Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ishwarlal vs Unknown
Judges:
17 January, 2012·This application has been called out thrice. At all calls, the learned advocate for the applicants has not remained present. In the circumstances, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution.( Harsha Devani, J. ) hki Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mandori vs Gujarat
Judges:
17 January, 2012·RULE.Mr.D.G.Shukla, learned advocate appears for the respondent-GPSC and Mr.Alkesh N. Shah, learned Assistant Government Pleader appears for the State and waive service of rule in all matters.Considering the interim relief as prayed for the same cannot be granted at this stage as the same would amou...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sohansing vs Commissioner
Judges:
17 January, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 02.10.2011 passed by respondent No.1, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short" the Act) by detaining the detenu as a "bootlegger" as defined under Sec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vishal vs Union
Judges:
17 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 16 days in filing OJ Appeal. Though served, nobody appears on behalf of the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.2. Considering the contents of the application, it cannot be said that the de...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jagadish vs State
Judges:
17 January, 2012·[1] Rule.Learned APP Ms.Krina Calla waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent - State.[2] Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that charge sheet is filed. It is further submitted that considering the nature of allegations and role attributed to the applicant, by i...
High Court Of Gujarat
International vs Ambalal
Judges:
17 January, 2012·Mr.Pahwa, learned Advocate has submitted that the opponent in present application has preferred O.J. Appeal against the decision dated 15.11.2011 and the said O.J. Appeal is pending. In that view of the matter, the hearing of present application is deferred, for the present, to 27th January 2012, in...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.