State vs Unknown
Judges:
19 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Admit.To be heard with Criminal Appeal No.1176/11.(JAYANT PATEL, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) *bjoy Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vinubhai vs Taluka
Judges:
19 January, 2012·1. This petition under Article-226 of the Constitution of India has been filed, with the following prayers :"A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus/certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to declare that the Res. No.4 is disabled to continue as a member of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rudiben vs Parvatiben
Judges:
19 January, 2012·Ms.Shah, learned advocate for the respondent, drew my attention to the earlier orders (1) dated 11.4.2011 whereby this Court directed the trial Court to the effect that the trial Court to proceed with the matter without considering the fact that the instant application is pending before this Court a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arbuda vs State
Judges:
19 January, 2012·Mr.Dakshesh Metha, learned advocate for the petitioners does not press this application for petitioner no.2-Kantibhai Gobarbhai Chaudhary, but, it is submitted that the petition is pressed for petitioner no.1-M/s.Arbuda Builders.Mr.Mehta, learned advocate for the petitioners took me through copy of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Yunusbhai vs State
Judges:
19 January, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner states that the petitioner has deposited Rs.10,000/- on 13.01.2012 before the trial Court. Learned advocate for the petitioner has produced photocopy of the receipt, which is ordered to be taken on record.Having heard learned advocate for the parties and consideri...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahendrapari vs State
Judges:
19 January, 2012·Though the matter is called out thrice, none on behalf of the applicant is present. Respondent Nos.3 and 4 are served but neither the respondents nor any counsel on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 are present.Mr.J.L.Hajare, leaned counsel for the respondent No.2, states that since long neither ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Yogeshbhai vs Hatkeshwar
Judges:
19 January, 2012·The endorsement on the board shows that respondent No.10 is unserved-expired. In the circumstances, the matter is adjourned to 8th February 2012, to enable the learned advocate to do the needful for bringing on record the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased-respondent No.10.(HARSHA DEVAN...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bai vs Jayantilal
Judges:
19 January, 2012·Prima facie, in Para-17 of the judgment and award impugned in this appeal, the tribunal has observed that there is no nexus between the injury and the death of the deceased.However, Mr. Mehta, learned Counsel for the appellants, requests for time. Hence, S.O. to 31st January, 2012.It is reported tha...
High Court Of Gujarat
Harshadray vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
19 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Let the matter appear on February 2, 2012 within first ten matters.(BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, ACTING CJ.) (J.B.PARDIWALA, J.) zgs/-Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Saiyedali vs State
Judges:
19 January, 2012·Learned Advocate Ms. Sheeja Nair appearing for learned Advocate Ms. Sudha C. Shukla for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application as there are some anamolies in the draft of this application, with a liberty to file a fresh application for bail.Permission with the liberty as prayed ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.