Kotak vs Banpal
Judges:
27 February, 2012·1. When the application is called out and taken up for hearing, learned Advocate for the applicant Bank is not present.2. Ms.Parikh, learned Advocate for the opponent is present. She submitted that the opponent company has complied with the terms and conditions of the settlement and the terms and co...
High Court Of Gujarat
Baroda vs U
Judges:
27 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Learned counsel Mr.Jigar Raval for the respondent No.3 states that he may be permitted to withdraw the Vakalatnama as counsel for respondent No.3 for which he has filed a note dated 21.2.2012. In view of note submitted by learned counsel Mr.Jigar Raval, he i...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nimu vs State
Judges:
27 February, 2012·Shri A.J Shastri, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with a view to pursue the remedy available under law including pursuing the representation, already filed before the authority. Permission as sought for is granted. Matter is dismissed as withd...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prithvi vs White
Judges:
27 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) After hearing the Civil Application for some time, we find it necessary to enquire further into certain factual aspects of the matter. For the above purpose, opponent No.2 shall file an affidavit giving details of the plots leased to opponent No.1 firm situ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manchhabhai vs State
Judges:
27 February, 2012·[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-76 of 2011 registered with Agthala Police Station.[2] It is submitted by the learned advocate for the applicant that...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ganesh vs Bhavnagar
Judges:
27 February, 2012·Draft amendment is allowed. To be carried out forthwith.Ms.Sangeeta Pahwa, learned advocate for the petitioners submits that after the dismissal of the earlier writ petition filed by the petitioners in their individual capacity and after dismissal of the Letters Patent Appeal, pending hearing of the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Padmaben vs Driver
Judges:
27 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.L. SONI) This application is for condoning delay of 31 days in filing application to permit the applicants to prosecute the appeal as indigent person. Notice issued by this Court has already been served to opponent No.3 Insurance Company. For the purpose of deciding th...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Gauriben
Judges:
27 February, 2012·1. In connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 31.07.2005 in which Parsottambhai @ Arvindbhai Baria expired, the legal heirs of deceased preferred claim petition being M.A.C.P. No.705/2005 u/s.163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Bharuch....
High Court Of Gujarat
Ismailbhai vs Public
Judges:
27 February, 2012·Fresh notice to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 returnable on 19.03.2012.(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) pallav Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sumanben vs Unknown
Judges:
27 February, 2012·Mr.J. T. Trivedi, learned advocate for the applicants in both these matters prays for time, stating that the applicants would be filing an undertaking within a period of two weeks. Hence, the matters are adjourned to 13.3.2012.[HARSHA DEVANI, J.] parmar* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.