Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Kotak vs Banpal

High Court Of Gujarat|27 February, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. When the application is called out and taken up for hearing, learned Advocate for the applicant Bank is not present.
2. Ms.
Parikh, learned Advocate for the opponent is present. She submitted that the opponent company has complied with the terms and conditions of the settlement and the terms and conditions of the settlement were agreed upon by the applicant Bank after examining the policies which were offered to the Bank as part of the settlement.
3. Since learned Advocate for the applicant is not present, S.O. to 14th March 2012.
(K.M.THAKER, J.) jani Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kotak vs Banpal

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2012