Bhurabhai vs Satarshah
Judges:
28 February, 2012·Inspite of the order dated 23.01.2012, the Court fee is not deposited. In that view of the matter application as well as First Appeal stand dismissed.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) niru* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prakashchandra Keshenlalji ... vs State Of Gujarat & 1 ­
Judges:
28 February, 2012·PRAKASHCHANDRA KESHENLALJI MEENA & 5 Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 Respondent(s) ========================================= Appearance :MR PARTHIV A BHATT for Applicant(s) : 1 6. MR JK SHAH ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) : 1, None for Respondent(s) : 2, ===================...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhavuji vs State
Judges:
28 February, 2012·1. RULE.Mr.K.L. Pandya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives the service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent No.1 and Mr.Purohit, learned advocate waives the service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent No.2 - original petitioner.2. In the facts and circumstances of the case an...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs Mr
Judges:
28 February, 2012·1. RULE.Learned AGP Mr.Devang Dave waives service of rule on behalf of the respondents.2. The present application has been filed by the applicant for joining as party in main First Appeal (Stamp) No.335 of 2011 arising out of Land Reference Cases No.1417 to 1419 of 1992 on the grounds stated in the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sonaji vs The
Judges:
28 February, 2012·The applicant has by way of this Revision Application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenged the order dated 28.3.2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.4, Deesa below Ex.35 Application in Sessions Case No.178 of 2001 wher...
High Court Of Gujarat
Land vs W
Judges:
28 February, 2012·The present Civil Application has been filed by the applicant for bringing legal heirs of the opponent nos.1 and 2, who are the original claimants in Land Reference Case Nos.1733 to 1743 on the ground that the respondents-original claimants have expired and the proposed opponent nos.1/1 to 1/3 & 2/1...
High Court Of Gujarat
Avvalben vs Kathi
Judges:
28 February, 2012·Heard.In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed in terms of paragraph Nos. 6(B), 6(C) and 6(D). The application stands disposed of accordingly.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) ORDER IN FIRST APPEAL In view of the order passed in Civil Application No. 2323 of 2012, issue Fresh Notice to ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nareshkumar vs Vishnuprasad
Judges:
28 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Learned counsel Mr. G.M.Joshi prays for and is allowed a week's time to file affidavit-in-reply and no more time will be allowed. It is made clear that the matter will not be adjourned on any ground whatsoever. List on 7th March, 2012.(V.M.SAHAI,J) (A.J.DESA...
High Court Of Gujarat
Guj vs Legal
Judges:
28 February, 2012·1. On 15.02.2012, this Court has passed following order:-"Looking to the age of the deceased Prima facie, the multiplier of 16 is on higher side. With a view to enable the counsel to produce document at Exh.50 case is adjourned to 28.0.2012.In the meantime, office is directed to call for the R & P, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oriental vs Dharamchand
Judges:
28 February, 2012·1. This appeal has been preferred against the award passed under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.2. Obviously, this award is in the nature of an interim award, which is subject to adjustment against the final award, which may be passed in the main claim petition. Looking to the facts of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.