Mitaliben vs State
Judges:
28 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. Mr.Deepak Sanchela, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4 is allowed a week's time to file affidavit-in-reply.2. Prima facie, from the facts of the case, it is clear that the subject area of Radhanpur Municipality was notified on 13.2.2008 and thre...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manglaben vs Meghaji
Judges:
28 February, 2012·Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?To be referred to the Reporter or not ?Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Azir vs Project
Judges:
28 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.L. SONI)1. This application is for fixing date for final hearing of First Appeal No. 1692 of 2009. As could be seen from the application, the award passed by the Land Acquisition Officer is dated 7.2.1990. As could further be seen from the application, legal heirs of t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Suthar vs Kamlesh
Judges:
28 February, 2012·Learned advocate for the appellant has consistently sought adjournment since 31.01.2012. On earlier occasion he sought time to file affidavit to the effect that no assessment order is received in spite of the provisions of the I.T. Act. He has not produced the affidavit to that effect. Today, in the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Iffco vs Unknown
Judges:
28 February, 2012·Heard.In view of the averments made in the application same is allowed in terms of paragraph No. 4(A) and 4(C). Cross Objection Stamp No. 146 of 2011 in First Appeal No. 1119 of 2011 be restored on condition that the office objection will be removed within a period of one week from today. This appli...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bared vs State
Judges:
28 February, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the petitioner.Notice returnable on 5.3.2012.Meanwhile, the concerned officer in charge of the police station shall explain that why the complaint of the petitioner about missing daughter was not registered on relevant date.Direct service is permitted.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] /...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vijaybhai Ambabhai Siyani vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges:
28 February, 2012·Rule returnable on 28.3.2012.(Z. K. SAIYED, J) kks...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shailadev vs State
Judges:
28 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Heard learned counsel for the parties. Draft amendment is allowed. Learned counsel for the appellant to carry out draft amendment within a week's time. List on 13.3.2012.(V.M.SAHAI,J) (A.J.DESAI,J) ***vcdarji Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Jilubhai
Judges:
28 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) The present application has been preferred by the applicant for leave to prefer appeal against the judgement and order passed by the learned Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.62/08, whereby the accused have been acquitted for the offences under sections 34...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rahematben vs State
Judges:
28 February, 2012·This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed with the following prayers:"(A) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order and/ or direction and may be pleased to direct the respondents and their agents, servants, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.