Appearance: vs Mr Ar Thacker For
Judges:
09 February, 2012·Mr. S.M.Shah, learned Advocate for the petitioners states that since opponent No.1 was not found at the adedress, notice of Rule has not been served on him. As far as opponent No.2 is concerned, it has refused to accept the notice and opponent No.5 has already been served with the notice. In view of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Ys Lakhani For
Judges:
09 February, 2012·The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner's cabin/galla has forcibly been removed and no opportunity was made available to the petitioner before such removal. But the stand of the Panchayat is that the petitioner had voluntarily removed the cabin/galla.The prayer in this petition is for...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dhaneshbhai vs Kalupur
Judges:
09 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)1. Learned Advocate Mr. Shah with learned Advocate Mr. Chirag Trivedi for the appellant has placed on record communication dated 9.2.2012 on the basis of which, he stated that the default account for which respondent No.1 Bank had to institute the suit, has ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vasava vs State
Judges:
09 February, 2012·1. It is reported that Mr. A.J. Shastri, learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.4 is enable to appear on behalf of respondent No.4 as Counsel. Hence, fresh notice to respondent No. 4 returnable on 27.2.2012. Direct service permitted. Over and above, direct service, it would be open for the peti...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vanka vs Karsan
Judges:
09 February, 2012·Office is directed to list this matter on 14th February 2012 along with Cross Objections No.80 of 2011.(K.S.Jhaveri, J.) *mohd Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhupatbhai vs State
Judges:
09 February, 2012·No cogent reasons are made out to grant this application. Hence, rejected. The applicant is at liberty to file fresh application after the date of operation of the wife of the applicant is fixed by the doctor.( M.D.Shah, J ) srilatha Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mangabhai vs Alabhai
Judges:
09 February, 2012·Learned advocate for the respondents ensures that he shall not proceed with the matter before the trial Court tomorrow. On that condition the matter is adjourned to 28.2.2011.(Ms.Sonia Gokani, J. ) sudhir Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Devendriben vs State
Judges:
09 February, 2012·[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release her on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-244 of 2011 registered with Kalol Taluka Police Station, District - Gandhinagar for the offence punishable under Sec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jesa vs State
Judges:
09 February, 2012·[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicants have prayed to release them on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-96 of 2011 registered with Dhrol Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Gadhavi
Judges:
09 February, 2012·1.Heard Miss Sunita Ahuja, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr UA Trivedi, learned AGP for the respondents.2.It appears from the grounds of detention that a case for offence under sections 66(b), 65(a), (e), 81, 82, 116(2) of the Bombay Prohibition Act has been registered against the petitione...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.