Jayendra vs Punjab
Judges:
21 February, 2012·RULE.Direct service is permitted.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Roshankhan vs Dhanaram
Judges:
21 February, 2012·These appeals are filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and order passed by the MAC Tribunal, Kachchh at Gandhidham. An endeavour has been made by Mr Modi, learned counsel for the appellants to assail the judgment of the Tribunal saying that though there is no ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs None For
Judges:
21 February, 2012·FIRST APPEAL No. 572 of 2012:ADMIT.CIVIL APPLICATION No. 2008 of 2012:Rule returnable on 9th April 2012. In the meantime, the awarded amount along with interest will be deposited before the Tribunal.(K.S.Jhaveri, J.) *mohd Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arjanbhai vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
21 February, 2012·Mr.Shah learned counsel for the appellant states that in spite of all efforts, he is not able to receive any instructions from the appellant and therefore, he would not be in a position to assist the Court. In view of the above statement of Mr. Shah, it appears that the appellant is not interested i...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rahatbanu vs None For
Judges:
21 February, 2012·The present Civil Application has been filed by the applicants under Order - 22, Rule (4) of the Civil Procedure Code for bringing the heirs of the respondent No.1, who are respondents No.1/1 to 1/5 as well as 1/1/1 to 1/1/4.Though served nobody has remained present. In the circumstance, in view of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhavubhai vs Natverlal
Judges:
21 February, 2012·Mr.Bhatt learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to delete respondent no.1 as party-respondent from the present proceedings. Permission granted. Respondent no.1 be deleted as party-respondent from the present proceedings. Hence, the appeal is now ready. To be listed on 28.02.2012.[K.S. JH...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ishrarulhaque vs State
Judges:
21 February, 2012·Rule returnable on 5-3-2012. Ms.Krina Calla, learned APP waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent No.1-State.Learned advocate, Mr.M.A.Saiyed, is permitted to file his Vakalatnama on behalf of the original complainant.[M.D.SHAH,J.] radhan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jamil vs State
Judges:
21 February, 2012·It is submitted by learned advocate for the applicant that learned Sessions Court has acquitted the applicant accused and so this application has become infructuous. Hence, learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw present application. Permission is granted. Application stands ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Balkishan vs Surat
Judges:
21 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Mr.Sirish Joshi, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2 shall produce the resolution by which permission has been granted to increase plinth upto 3 ft. List on 27.2.2012.(V.M.SAHAI,J) (A.J.DESAI,J) ***vcdarji Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.