Chodhari vs State
Judges:
11 April, 2012·[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-76 of 2011 registered with Agthala Police Station.[2] It is submitted by the learned advocate for the applicant that...
High Court Of Gujarat
Valiben vs State
Judges:
11 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN) Heard learned counsel Shri V.K. Shah for the appellant and learned AGP Ms. Monali Bhatt for the respondent State.Question is regarding grant of permission for quarry lease.Learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that though earlier res...
High Court Of Gujarat
Havmor vs Unknown
Judges:
11 April, 2012·1. Mr.A.R. Majmudar, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant states that direct service has been served upon the respondent and affidavit of service shall be tendered today.2. Registry is directed to show the name of Mr. P.S.Champaneri for respondent and list this matter for further hearing on 1...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jigneshbhai vs State
Judges:
11 April, 2012·The present application has been filed by the applicant for grant of regular bail under section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, after the charge sheet is filed. The applicant is charged with having committed offences under sections 120(b), 489-A, B, C and 467, 468, 471 of Indian Penal Code ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vishal vs Union
Judges:
11 April, 2012·Heard learned advocate Mr.Rakesh Gupta with Mr.Uday Joshi, learned advocates for Messrs Trivedi & Gupta for the petitioners; and Mr.Anshin H. Desai, learned advocate for the respondents. The learned advocate for the petitioners relied upon a decision of the Hon'ble the Apex Court in the matter of Pu...
High Court Of Gujarat
Range vs Gemalsing
Judges:
11 April, 2012·1. Heard learned advocate for the parties. With the consent of the learned advocates for the parties, Rule is fixed forthwith.2. The Range Forest Officer, Extension Range, Padra, petitioner, and first party employer in Reference(L.C.V) No.843 of 1984 has preferred this petition under Article 227 of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Ms Trusha Patel
Judges:
11 April, 2012·None present for the respondents, though served, except learned APP. Delay of 54 days in filing Criminal Appeal is condoned in view of uncontroverted averments made in the application. Rule is made absolute with no order as to costs. Criminal Misc. Application No.3619 of 2009 and Criminal Appeal No....
High Court Of Gujarat
K vs Chief
Judges:
11 April, 2012·1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the adverse remarks made by the reviewing authority for the period between 01/04/2003 to 10/12/2003 whereby the Reporting Authori...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Omkargir
Judges:
11 April, 2012·1. Learned counsel for the appellant/s will take appropriate steps for serving unserved respondent/s within a period of four weeks from today, failing which, appropriate orders will be passed. S.O. to 9th May, 2012.2. In the meantime office is directed to call for R & P, so as to reach this court by...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.