Poonjabhai vs Mohanbhai
Judges:
12 April, 2012·Today, in the first round when the matter is called out, learned advocate for the appellant has not remained present. However, in the interest of justice, as a last chance, the matter is adjourned to 19.04.2012.It is made clear that if on that date, learned advocate for the appellant is not remained...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ramanjee vs State
Judges:
12 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) Learned counsel for the applicant does not press this application.Disposed of accordingly.(JAYANT PATEL, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) *bjoy Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shivuben vs State
Judges:
12 April, 2012·Mr.Dipak B. Patel, learned advocate for the petitioners, states that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition, with a view to pursuing their representations dated 10.11.2006 filed by the petitioners before the Bhavnagar Municipal Commissioner (respondent no.2).Permission to withdraw the petition...
High Court Of Gujarat
Patel vs Chaturji
Judges:
12 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 2 days in filing Letters Patent Appeal. The respondents are served. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Considering the contents of the application, it cannot be said that the delay caused in filing t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmedabad vs Official
Judges:
12 April, 2012·1. By an earlier order dated 2.3.2012, this Court (Coram: K.M. Thaker, J.) was pleased to observe as under:-"At the outset, Mr. Yadav, learned advocate for OL, has requested for two weeks' time in light of the communication dated 27.2.2012 received by the office of OL from the concerned Chartered Ac...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ratilal vs Klockner
Judges:
12 April, 2012·1. Mr.Nirav Joshi, learned Advocate for Nanavati Associates states that the respondent has taken back the papers and they have no instructions any more from the respondent. Mr. Joshi shall take appropriate steps as regards their appearance.2. In view of the above fresh notice to the respondent retur...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arvindbhai vs Vijaykumar
Judges:
12 April, 2012·The applicant has preferred the present application to restore the Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.15041 of 2010, which was dismissed for non-removal of office objection. The applicant has also prayed to condone the delay of 381 days caused in preferring the restoration application.Heard.In vi...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Azimuddin
Judges:
12 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) The appeal is preferred from the interim order of learned Single Judge of this Court in pending Special Civil Application no. 4238 of 2011. By the impugned order dated 27/12/2011, it is clearly stipulated that the interim order is subject to further order th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Satyendra vs State
Judges:
12 April, 2012·If trial is not completed within a period of one year, the applicant will be at liberty to prefer fresh bail application.In view of above, learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw present application. Permission is granted. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule dis...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.