Amrutbhai vs State
Judges:
16 April, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the petitioners.Considering the nature of dispute and for the alleged incident according to the complainant are of the year 2003 onwards.Notice returnable on 19.6.2012.Learned APP, waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1.Meanwhile ad-interim relief in terms o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Union vs None For
Judges:
16 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) After elaborate arguments on the basis of material placed before the tribunal and before this Court, learned counsel could not persuade the Court to hold that the view taken by Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Ahmedabad, was in any way perverse or illo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rahemankhan vs State
Judges:
16 April, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the applicant.Notice returnable on 13.6.2012.Meanwhile no coercive action against the applicant keeping it open for the investigating officer to investigate the offences meaning thereby to record the statement and scrutiny of documents etc. Direct service is permitted.[ANA...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nitin vs State
Judges:
16 April, 2012·Present Civil Application is rejected due to paucity of time, but permission is granted to the learned advocate for filing a fresh application for fixing date after Summer Vacation.(S.R. BRAHMBHATT, J.) (vipul) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Farooqbhai vs State
Judges:
16 April, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the applicants.Notice returnable on 12.6.2012.Learned APP, waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1.Direct service to respondent NO.2 is permitted.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajnikant Bhogilal Patel & 4 vs State Of Gujarat Thro Secretary & 2
Judges:
16 April, 2012·Notice returnable on 30/04/2012. In the meanwhile if respondent no.3 wants to file affidavit contesting the petition, the same may be filed by 26/04/2012 with a copy to the petitioner. Either the petitioner or the respondents shall place on record, the proceedings of the District Registrar, before t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Apollo vs Rajendra
Judges:
16 April, 2012·RULE.Mr. Mishra, learned advocate waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent. With consent of the learned advocates for the parties, this application is taken up for final disposal forthwith.Considering the averments made in the application and there being no opposition, the application dese...
High Court Of Gujarat
Liquidator vs Ashish
Judges:
16 April, 2012·Considering that the issue involved in this application and Company Application No.408 of 2011 are interwoven, the present application is adjourned to 2.5.2011. Mr. Jigar M. Patel, learned advocate for respondent No.5 on earlier occasion had made statement to maintain status-quo which has been conti...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ravjibhai vs Agricultural
Judges:
16 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) ADMIT.(V.M.SAHAI, J.) (A.J.DESAI, J.) syed/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sarojben vs Municipal
Judges:
16 April, 2012·Mr.Ashwin R. Patel, learned advocate states that Mr.C.G.Sharma, learned advocate has received instructions to appear on behalf of respondents Nos.4, 5, 16, 20, 22 and 25. He prays for time in order to file the Vakalatnama and affidavit-in-reply, if any.The endorsement on the Board indicates that not...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.