Bai vs State
Judges:
21 April, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 30.12.2011 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short" the Act) by detaining the detenu as a "bootlegger" as defined under Sec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pratapdan vs Laxmiben
Judges:
20 April, 2012·During the course of hearing learned advocate Mr.V.N.Mapara seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Permission is granted. Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits and neither side shall not prejudice his rights by disposal of this petition. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manishbhai vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·BELOW SPEAKING TO MINUTES DATED 19.4.2012:Considering the averments made in the application, this speaking to minutes is allowed. The condition no.5(g) in order dated 13.4.2012 be read as under:"5(g) deposit an amount of Rs.20.00 (Rupees Twenty Lakhs Only) with the Vadodara Municipal Corporation wit...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs None For
Judges:
20 April, 2012·Inspite of the order passed earlier dated 7.3.2012, learned Advocate has not remained present nor anyone has mentioned. On earlier occasions, for about half a dozen times, nobody has remained present.In the circumstances, the present First Appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.(Rajesh H. S...
High Court Of Gujarat
Consumer vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Let this matter appear along with the main W.P (PIL) No. 77 of 2012 on next Friday i.e. April 27, 2012 as first item after the fresh matter. Affidavit be filed in the meantime.(Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Actg. C.J.) (J.B.Pardiwala, J.) *...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sikka vs Kamuben
Judges:
20 April, 2012·SIKKA MUNICIPALITY - Petitioner(s) Versus KAMUBEN RATILAL VADHELA & 1 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance :MR RC KAKKAD for Petitioner(s) : 1, RULE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 1 -2. ========================================================= CORAM :HONOU...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kana vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·Upon written instructions received from the office of the District Superintendent of Police, Porbandar, learned APP submits that in case if the petitioner apprehends any danger to his life while attending trial before the competent court, necessary protection will be provided to him in accordance wi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ransingh vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present petition is filed by one Shri Ransingh Badrisingh Rajput seeking relief to the effect that a similar order as is passed in Special Civil Application No.18659 of 2007 be passed in this matter.It is reported by the learned Advocates for the par...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nasrullakhan vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·The order of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Mehsana dated 27th January 2012 grating regular bail to the father in law and brother in law of the deceased-Sabana Bhanu is challenged in this application, preferred under Section 401 read with Section 397 CrPC. The main challenge is on the ground that the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Raghubha vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·Rule.Ms.CM Shah, learned APP appears and waives service of rule for respondent No.1 - State.By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with CR No.I-3 of 2012 registered with Rad...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.