P.G.27 Thookkanaickenpalayam ... vs 3 The Principal District Judge
Judges:
19 September, 2017·According to the petitioner, the first respondent Senthil Kumar was employed as Secretary in the petitioner society. During the relevant period, he has committed serious irregularities and lapses causing huge loss to the society. An enquiry under section 81 of the Tamilnadu Cooperative Societies Act...
Madras High Court
Mrs.Sunitha vs The Addl. Commissioner Of
Judges:
19 September, 2017·Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connec...
Madras High Court
The Principal Commissioner Of Customs Iii ( Siib ) And Others vs M/S B V Leathers And Others
Judges: S Manikumar, V Bhavani Subbaroyan
19 September, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN W.A.No.1138 of 2017 and CMP No.15781 of 20171. The Principal Commissioner of Customs-III (SIIB), Customs House, Chennai -1.2. The Commissioner of Customs, Chennai-IV, Commissionerate, Customs House, Chennai - 1...
Madras High Court
Commissioner Of Central Excise Salem vs M/S Pallava Textiles Ltd
Judges: S Manikumar, V Bhavani Subbaroyan
19 September, 2017·(Order of the Court was delivered by V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN,J.) This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 15.12.2016 passed by the CESTAT, South Zonal Bench at Chennai in final Order No.40291/ 2016 in Appeal No.E/148/2009.2...
Madras High Court
Gail India Pvt Ltd vs The Commercial Tax Officer
Judges: S Manikumar, V Bhavani Subbaroyan
19 September, 2017·This Writ Appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the order of this Court dated 28.06.2016 passed in W.P.No.35782 of 2015.2. Brief facts of the case of the appellant are as follows:2.1 Appellant is a Central Public Sector Undertaking engaged in the business of transmission, distribution a...
Madras High Court
A Devaisigamani vs The Special Officer/Administrator And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
19 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.09.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.10515 of 2005 and WPMP.No.11427 of 2005 A.Devaisigamani ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Special Officer/Administrator, Kallakurichi II, Cooperative Sugar Mills, Katchirayap...
Madras High Court
S Shanmugavel /Complainant vs N Indhulekha
Judges: N Authinathan
19 September, 2017·The complainant in S.T.C.No.246 of 2012 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.2, Erode, is the appellant. He filed the complaint for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the allegations that the respondent herein/accused had borrowed a sum ...
Madras High Court
V Kusalen vs The Secretary To Government Rural Development Board And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
19 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.09.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.11555 of 2005 V.Kusalen ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Secretary to Government Rural Development Board, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.2. The Director of Rural Develop...
Madras High Court
The State Represented By The Public Prosecutor vs Tr K Kandavadivel
Judges: N Authinathan
19 September, 2017·The accused in S.T.C.No.4 of 2012 is the appellant in Crl.A.No.432 of 2016 and the accused in S.T.C.No.5 of 2012 is the appellant in Crl.A.433 of 2016.2. The Criminal Appeal No.432 of 2016 is directed against the order of acquittal in S.T.C.No.4 of 2012 dated 22.05.2015 on the file of the Chief Judi...
Madras High Court
R Settu @ Lakshmanan /Accuse vs State Rep By The Inspector Of Police Pallipalayam Police Station Namakkal District Crime No 1067 Of 2008
Judges: S Baskaran
19 September, 2017·The appellant is the accused in S.C.No.36 of 2009 on the file of Principal Sessions Court, Namakkal and he has been convicted for the offence under Section 304 Part II IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.