Mr Shahjahan vs The Returning Officer And Others
Judges: V Parthiban
04 October, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that due to subsequent development, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition and hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this ...
Madras High Court
S Kr Viswanathan vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Others
Judges: V Parthiban
04 October, 2017·When the matter was called on 03.10.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court has posted the matter under the caption “For dismissal” on 04.10.2017. But, even today when the matter was called, there is no representation for the petitioner.2. Hence,...
Madras High Court
Muniyaselvam vs Jeyamani
Judges: A Selvam, P Kalaiyarasan
04 October, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 04.10.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN Contempt Petition[MD] No.1254 of 2017 in W.P.[MD] No.4 of 2017 Petitioner Respondent Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Conte...
Madras High Court
Pon Angel vs The Superintendant Of Police
Judges:
04 October, 2017·This petition is filed for issuing a direction to the second respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondents 3 and 4 and the further relief also for directing the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in this regard.2. It is sated that the petitioner...
Madras High Court
Sakthi Coffee Estates (P) Ltd vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
04 October, 2017·The petitioner has come forward with above Writ Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondents, relating to the orders of the fourth respondent in Ref. No.A.2103/2000 dated 30.05.2003, Ref.No.A.2103/2000 dated 30.05.2003 and Ref. No.A.2...
Madras High Court
R Arunkumar Proprietor M/S A R Builders And Associates vs M/S Shankara Infrastructure Materials Limited
Judges: D Krishnakumar
04 October, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR CRP. (PD) Nos.968 & 969 of 2017 and CMP. No.4809 of 2017 R.Arunkumar Proprietor M/s. A.R. Builders and Associates ... Petitioner in both CRPs Vs.M/s.Shankara Infrastructure Materials Limited, Registered Office at G-w Farah Winsfor, No.133, Infant...
Madras High Court
Mr V Bhaskar And Others vs Idbi Bank Limited And Others
Judges: S Manikumar, R Suresh Kumar
04 October, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.10.2017 CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMARW.P.No.22846 of 2017 and WMP No.24016 of 20171. Mr.V.Bhaskar2. Mrs.Hemasree ... Petitioners vs.1. IDBI Bank Limited, Rep. by the Authorized...
Madras High Court
Mr P Danaraj And Others vs M/S Diamond Engineering ( Chennai ) Pvt Ltd Rep By The Interim Resolution Professional Mr V Magesh No 39/19 Aspen Court And Others
Judges: S Manikumar, R Suresh Kumar
04 October, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J) E-auction notice, dated 29/8/2017, is impugned by the guarantors, on the grounds inter alia that, on 6/6/2017, an order of moratorium has been issued, by the National Company Law Tribunal, Division Bench, Chennai, at the instance of Shah Brother...
Madras High Court
K M Sirajudeen vs The State Of Tamilnadu And Others
Judges: M V Muralidaran
04 October, 2017·The petitioner has filed this Criminal Original Petition praying to call for the records in C.C.No.216 of 2009, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Poonamallee and to quash the same.2. It is the case of the petitioner that on a complaint dated 16.06.2009 lodged by one S.Arunachalam before t...
Madras High Court
R Mala vs B Vignesh
Judges: M V Muralidaran
04 October, 2017·The petitioner has filed this Criminal Original Petition praying to quash the complaint in STC No.19 of 2008, pending against her, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Coimbatore.2. The petitioner by invoking inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seek to quash the p...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.