Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Mr Shahjahan vs The Returning Officer And Others

Madras High Court|04 October, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that due to subsequent development, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition and hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
04.10.2017 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes gsk To
1. The Returning Officer, Salem-1 Legislative Assembly Constituency Cum Commissioner, Salem Corporation, Salem.
2. The District Election Officer, Cum District Collector, Salem District, Salem-1.
3. The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Public (Elections) Dept, http://www.judis.nic.in Fort St.George, Chennai-9.
W.P.No.13191 of 2006
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mr Shahjahan vs The Returning Officer And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
04 October, 2017
Judges
  • V Parthiban