T H M Manoj Prabhu / Accused E vs S E Kgisl Technologies And Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
Judges: S Vimala O F Criminal
06 October, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.10.2017 CORAM:THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Criminal Revision Case No.1239 of 2017 & Crl.M.P.No.11877 of 2017 M.Manoj Prabhu ... Petitioner / accused ..Vs..KGISL Technologies and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Project Enginee...
Madras High Court
M/S Navasakthi Township Developers Private Limited vs The Commissioner Of Central Excise & Service Tax
Judges: S Manikumar, R Suresh Kumar
06 October, 2017·(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR,J.) This appeal has been preferred against the order passed by the learned Judge in W.P.No.18354 of 2017 dated 19.7.2017.2. The very minimum facts which are required to be noticed for the disposal of this appeal are as follows:(i) The appellant ...
Madras High Court
Tmt.M.Hemalatha vs The Director General Of Police
Judges:
06 October, 2017·Having suffered an order of removal from service, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was appointed as Grade-II Women Police Constable in the Tamil Nadu Special Police XVth Battalion, Vellore @ Avadi, Chennai, on 21.01.2011 ...
Madras High Court
Mrs Rajeshwari vs V N Raghunathan
Judges: C T Selvam, M V Muralidaran
06 October, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN C.M.A.No.3288 of 2013 Mrs.Rajeshwari V.N.Raghunathan Vs... Appellant .. Respondent Prayer:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal preferred under Section 19 of Family Court Act, against the Judgement and Decree dated 18.09.2013...
Madras High Court
Munikrishnappa vs The Tahsildar And Others
Judges: V Parthiban
06 October, 2017·In view of the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the official respondent that the petitioner is no more. Nothing survives for consideration as far as the present writ petition is concerned.Taluk Office, Hosur, Dharmapuri Dist.2.The Head Quarter Deputy Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Hosur...
Madras High Court
S Senthamarai Kannan vs The Secretary To Government ( Home ) And Others
Judges: V Parthiban
06 October, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
Madras High Court
M Murugan vs Punjab National Bank Rep By Its Authorised Officer Circle Office : Iii Floor ( 781 ) Anna Salai Chennai 600 002 And Others
Judges: S Manikumar, R Suresh Kumar
06 October, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J) There is no representation for the petitioner.2. Prayer sought for in the writ petition, is to quash the impugned auction sale, dated 29/3/2012, in respect of item No.3 and all consequent proceedings of the second respondent and consequently, di...
Madras High Court
Ramachandiran And Others vs The Estate Officer Cum Deputy Collector ( Revenue ) South
Judges: M V Muralidaran
06 October, 2017·The petitioners have filed this Civil Revision Petition to set aside order dated 10.01.2011 made in M.A.No.2 of 2010 on the file of the IIIrd Additional District Judge, Pudhucherry.2. The case of the revision petitioners is that a portion of land in R.S.No.47/1 of Kurumbapet Revenue Village measurin...
Madras High Court
M Shriraman vs M/S Padmapriya
Judges: A Selvam, P Kalaiyarasan
06 October, 2017·(Judgment of the Court was delivered by A.SELVAM, J.) This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been directed against the order dated 17.08.2016, passed in O.P.No.1838 of 2009, by the the III Additional Family Court, at Chennai.http://www.judis.nic.in2. The appellant herein, as petitioner, has filed...
Madras High Court
The Director Of Elementary Education And Others vs G Raghunath
Judges: M Venugopal, P D Audikesavalu
06 October, 2017·M.VENUGOPAL, J.The Petitioners/Appellants/Respondents have preferred the instant Review Application as against the order dated 28.03.2016 in W.A.No.255 of 2015 passed by this Court.2. Earlier, this Court, in W.A.No.255 of 2015 on 28.03.2016 [filed by the Review Petitioners/Appellants/ Responden...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.