R.Rajkumar vs 4 The Commandant
Judges:
06 November, 2017·(Judgment of the court was made by HULUVADI G.RAMESH, J.) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.2. Though the appellant/writ petitioner filed the writ petition challenging the transfer order, which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge, now seeks indulgence of this court placing an...
Madras High Court
K.Rajendran vs The Inspector General Of ...
Judges:
06 November, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to Circular No.67 dated 03.11.2011 issued by the first respondent and consequential order passed by the second respondent in Pa.Mu.No.59...
Madras High Court
Cmp Garments vs 2 The Joint Director Of Industrial
Judges:
06 November, 2017·The Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents, their men, officers, agents, servants, representatives and any one claiming through or under them or any other person from in any manner applying the Impugned Government Order in G.O. (2D) NO. 59, Labour and...
Madras High Court
Crl.O.P.No.23712 Of 2017 vs The State Rep. By
Judges:
06 November, 2017·This petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent police to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 27.10.2017.2.By consent of both sides, this Criminal Original Petition is taken up for final disposal.3.The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of a complai...
Madras High Court
S.Selvaraj vs R.Rengarajan
Judges:
06 November, 2017·This contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for their willful, deliberate, disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P.(MD)No.6006 of 2016 dated 28.03.2016.2.Heard, Mr.D.Senthil, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.D.Sivaraman, learned counsel appearing for t...
Madras High Court
P.Rajendran vs Rengarajan
Judges:
06 November, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as respondents submitted that except interest on computation, the entire amount has been paid.2.Recording the said submission, this contempt petition is closed with a direction to the respondents to pay the balance amount within a period of tw...
Madras High Court
M.Ramraj vs Rengarajan
Judges:
06 November, 2017·Prayer: Contempt Petition filed Under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnors/respondents and punish him for the willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P(MD).No.22554 of 2015 dated 21.01.2016.The learned counsel appearing f...
Madras High Court
Kapoor @ Chinna Kapoor vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
06 November, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J] The petitioner is the detenu viz. Kapoor @ Chinna Kapoor, son of Majith, aged about 39 years. The detenu has been detained, as per the order of the second respondent, dated 31.05.2017, under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982, branding him as ...
Madras High Court
Nagaraj vs The Deputy Superintendent Of ...
Judges:
06 November, 2017·In view of the amendments made in the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, this Court is of the view that the usual directions that were issued by this Court cannot be issued routinely in all cases. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to surrender before ...
Madras High Court
K.Vijila vs Thirumani
Judges:
06 November, 2017·This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.203 of 2017 from the file of the Sub-Court, Thoothukudi and transfer the same to the file of the Sub-Court, Padmanabhapuram. The petitioner is the wife.2. The case of the petit...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.