P.Paramasivan vs Thiru.M.Devadass
Judges:
17 November, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this criminal original petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequ...
Madras High Court
Crl.O.P.No.24938 Of 2017 vs The Commissioner Of Police
Judges:
17 November, 2017·This petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 18.09.2017.2.By consent of both sides, this Criminal Original Petition is taken up for final disposal.3.The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of a complaint given by hi...
Madras High Court
Rama Vasudevan vs Senthil Kumar
Judges: D Krishnakumar
17 November, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.11.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR CRP.(NPD).No.4196 of 2017 Rama Vasudevan ..Petitioner Vs.Senthil Kumar ..Respondent PRAYER:The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of ...
Madras High Court
Kaliyaperumal vs The Revenue Divisional Officer And Others
Judges: V Parthiban
17 November, 2017·It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the criminal case initiated against the petitioner ended in acquittal.2. In view of the subsequent development, the issue raised in the writ petition does not survive for consideration before this Court any further. Therefore, the writ...
Madras High Court
M.G.Rahamathullah vs Tmt.K.K.Manjula
Judges:
17 November, 2017·The petitioner, alleging non-compliance of the order dated 01.07.2016 made in W.P.No.22717 of 2016, has filed this contempt petition.2. The contempt petition was entertained on 14.07.2017 and thereafter, it was adjourned thrice and on 20.10.2017, this Court, having found that the judgment cited in t...
Madras High Court
Church Of Swedish Mission vs The District Revenue Officer
Judges:
17 November, 2017·This petition has been filed, seeking to forbear the respondents 1 & 2 from effecting any mutation in the name of the 3rd respondent in respect of the property, comprised in S.Nos.79/1, 79/2 & 80/2, Paramakudi Taluk, without issuing any notice of enquiry to the petitioner on the basis of the petitio...
Madras High Court
National Insurance Company Ltd vs P.Ayyappan ... 1St
Judges:
17 November, 2017·This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the award, dated 30.03.2007, received by the appellant on 25.05.2007, made in W.C.No.89 of 2005 on the file of the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner & Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Tirunelveli.2.The case of the claimant/first respondent, as a...
Madras High Court
Murugaiya vs Kanagaraj
Judges:
17 November, 2017·The claimant has filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the judgment and decree made in M.C.O.P.No.5 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (Chief Judicial Magistrate) Tirunelveli, dated 08.10.2010.2. The brief facts of the case are as follows: On 08.12.2007 at about 08.30...
Madras High Court
V Selvaraj vs K Nagalingam
Judges: M V Muralidaran
17 November, 2017·When the matter came up before this Court on 16.11.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, it was adjourned today i.e., 17.11.2017 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismisse...
Madras High Court
Chakkaravarthi vs Kala
Judges: M Duraiswamy
17 November, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 17.11.2017 Coram THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY C.M.A.No.1874 of 2015 & M.P.Nos. 1 & 2 of 2015 Chakkaravarthi ... Appellant v.Kala ... Respondent Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Orde...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.