R.Vijayakumar vs R.Mathiazhagan
Judges:
01 March, 2017·It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the suit in O.S.No.7325 of 2011 itself has been disposed of. Hence, the prayer in the transfer petitions have become infructuous. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also made endorsement on the petitions.2. In view of the same,...
Madras High Court
K.Saravana Shanthi vs The District Elementary ...
Judges:
01 March, 2017·The prayer in the writ petition is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records connected with the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.5888/Aa2/2011 dated 31.10.2011 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents 1 and 2 to approve the appoi...
Madras High Court
Madurai District Co-Operative vs The Inspector Of Factories
Judges:
01 March, 2017·2.K.Arjunan3.S.Murugan .. Respondents 2 & 3 in WP(MD)No.5663 of 20114.A.Gurusamy5.N.Selvam6.E.Manickam7.E.Subramani8.K.Sivalingam .. Respondents 2 to 6 in WP(MD)No.5664 of 20119.S.Balasubramani .. 2nd Respondent in WP(MD)No.5665 of 201110.M.Chandran11.P.Mahendran12.C.Radhakrishnan13.K.Ramesh14.P.Per...
Madras High Court
) Chandra vs M. Rajendran
Judges:
01 March, 2017·The appellant Chandra claiming that her husband Kannaiyan was an employee under the 1st respondent, died in an accident, in the course of employment, filed the claim petition No.242 of 2014 under Section 10[1] of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, before the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II Chen...
Madras High Court
L.Dharmalingam vs 4 The Executive Officer
Judges:
01 March, 2017·Petitioners in all the three writ petitions challenged the eviction notice on the ground that no opportunity had been given to them. It is the contentions of the petitioners that the Executive Officer had no authority to issue the said eviction notice under Section 78(i) of the H.R.& C.E. Act.2. Lea...
Madras High Court
N. Rajinikanth vs N. Thandavamurthy
Judges:
01 March, 2017·Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J srn2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement so made, this Civi...
Madras High Court
Muthamizh Selvi vs Lakshmanan
Judges:
01 March, 2017·The defendant in the suit in O.S.No.137 of 2006 on the file of the Sub Court, Periyakulam, is the appellant in the above Second Appeal. The respondent herein filed a suit in O.S.No.137 of 2006 for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 28.10.2004 entered into between the plaintiff and th...
Madras High Court
M/S. 3 Star Detective & Security ... vs The Principal
Judges:
01 March, 2017·This writ petition is listed today under the caption 'for Maintainability'.2. Office has entertained a doubt regarding the maintainability of the writ petition as the order dated 05.11.2016, which is subjected to challenge in this writ petition, has not been signed by the respondent. Further, the pe...
Madras High Court
Coram vs Ananthi
Judges:
01 March, 2017·Petitioner challenges the order of learned learned II Additional Judge, Family Court, Chennai, passed in M.P.No.291 of 2015 in M.C.No.328 of 2014 on 29.07.2016.2. Petitioner and first respondent were married on 26.04.1992. Out of the wedlock, two girl children were born. Differences arose between th...
Madras High Court
Balraj Vasudevan vs State Rep. By
Judges:
01 March, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In the light of endorsement made by the learned counsel for petitioner, this Criminal Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Misc...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.