P.Erulandi vs The District Collector
Judges:
16 March, 2017·The Petitioner has approached this Court seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to survey the Petitioner's land and fix the metes and bounds of the Petitioner's property situated in S.No.172/1B3B, for an extent of 12.5 cents, in patta No.1907 of T.Kunnathur Village, P...
Madras High Court
Mrs.R.Manjula vs Mr.S.Jayachandran
Judges:
16 March, 2017·It is represented by both sides that the order which is the subject matter of this Contempt Petition has been complied with by the respondent.M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.jvm2. In the light of the above, this Contempt Petition is closed.16.03.2017 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No jvm To Mr.S.Jayachandra...
Madras High Court
P.Kasi vs Kumaran @ Kumarakuruswami
Judges:
16 March, 2017·When the Second Appeal came up for hearing on 09.03.2017, there was no representation for the appellant, and hence, it was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal" today (16.03.2017). Even today, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for d...
Madras High Court
D.Kallavandan @ Kallavendhan vs State Rep. By
Judges:
16 March, 2017·Today, Mr.Gomathinathan, Sub-Inspector of Police, Kuruvikulam Police Station is present.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), on instructions, submitted that on the complaint given by the petitioner against the second respondent, a petition enq...
Madras High Court
Lingammal vs 8 Vidya Rani
Judges:
16 March, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by the Acting Chief Justice) The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to implement the order of removing the encroachments in the water channel - Maruthavali Raja Vaikal in S.F. No.125/1 at Odanthu...
Madras High Court
T.Thilagavathi vs The Competent Authority Cum ...
Judges:
16 March, 2017·The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.To1.The Competent Authority cum District Revenue Officer, (Land Acquisitio...
Madras High Court
K.Govindaraj vs P.Haridoss
Judges:
16 March, 2017·It is represented that the order which is the subject matter of this Contempt Petition has been complied with and the respondent has also sent a communication dated 19.09.2016 to the Government Pleader, High Court, Madras, which is taken on file and recorded. M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.jvm2. In the light ...
Madras High Court
The Devakottai Muncipality vs The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Judges:
16 March, 2017·This Writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to provide Electricity Service connection to the petitioner's Travellers Bungalow is situated in T.S.No.9, Block 5, Ward A, Devakkottai Town, Sivagangai District.2. Heard the learne...
Madras High Court
Saraswathy vs Thiru Vi Ka Nagar Benefit Fund Ltd
Judges:
16 March, 2017·Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition and to that effect, he has also made an endorsement.2.Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdraw....
Madras High Court
P.B.Tamilselvan vs Kaliammal @ Kamala (Died)
Judges:
16 March, 2017·When the matter was taken up for hearing on 14.03.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. Therefore, the case was ordered to be listed today under the caption ?for dismissal?. Even today(16.03.2017),when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellants. Henc...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.