Parvatham vs The District Collector
Judges:
05 June, 2017·The sum and substance of the grievance of the petitioner is that respondents 3 and 4 have allotted a tender in favour of the fifth respondent without following the due procedure which also prevented the petitioner from taking part in the auction. The petitioner has made a representation to the first...
Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Tmt. Rahamathunnisa
Judges:
05 June, 2017·(Made by S.Manikumar, J.) Being aggrieved by the award made in M.C.O.P.No.248 of 2006, dated 26.04.2013, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Additional District Judge), Kancheepuram District at Chengalpattu, the present appeal has been filed.2. On 15.01.2006, about 4.00 p.m, when th...
Madras High Court
Visalakshi vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Its Secretary And Others
Judges: R Mahadevan
05 June, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.06.2017 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.10651 of 2017 Visalakshi ... Petitioner Vs1. The Government of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary, Home (Prison) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009....
Madras High Court
R. Sridhar vs The Presiding Officer
Judges:
05 June, 2017·The petitioner raised an industrial dispute, which is pending consideration in I.D.No.361 of 2014 before the III Additional Labour Court, Chennai. Seeking to expedite the same, the present writ petition has been filed.2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3.Considering the limited...
Madras High Court
Rukmangadhan vs Kanchana
Judges:
05 June, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition has been filed praying to set aside the impugned common order in I.A.No.105 & 106 of 2017 in HMOP.No.14 of 2008 and separate decretal orders in I.A.Nos.105 & 106 of 2017 in HMOP.No.14 of 2008 dated 23.02.2017 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge at Tambaram and to dis...
Madras High Court
T.S.Surulivel vs Rajendran
Judges:
05 June, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order passed by the Trial Court in I.A.No.243 of 2014 filed under Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC.2.The grievance of the revision petitioner is that the Trial Court has allowed the application for appointment of Advocate Commissioner without considering th...
Madras High Court
P.Thirugnanam vs The Agricultural Production ...
Judges:
05 June, 2017·This Writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent i.e., the Agricultural Production Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government, Chennai to pass appropriate orders on the proposals sent by the Commissioner of Agriculture, Ch...
Madras High Court
M/S.New All Engineering Works vs The Tamil Nadu Small Industries
Judges:
05 June, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the above endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, conn...
Madras High Court
Syed vs Nazrin
Judges:
05 June, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this Criminal Original Petition sta...
Madras High Court
C.Rajeswari vs Arulmigu Dharmaraja Temple
Judges:
05 June, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioner made an endorsement indicating that he is withdrawing the Civil Revision Petition. K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.(svki)2. In view of the endorsement so made, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.