P.Purusothaman vs The Registrar Of Cooperative ...
Judges:
05 June, 2017·The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to direct the respondents to quash the order of the 2nd respondent made in Na.Ka. No. 3722/2013-A4 dated 29.08.2013.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner Society is said to have suffered a loss of 1.5 crores during the...
Madras High Court
Mrs.Halima Banu vs Mrs.Meghalaa Bhaskaran
Judges:
05 June, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Rent Controller (Principal District Munsif), Alandur, to pass orders in M.P.No.55 of 2016 in R.C.O.P.No.15 of 2016 within a stipulated period of time.2. The petitioner is the owner of the property and respondent is the tenant. Th...
Madras High Court
Tmt.J.Regina vs Thiru.M.Palanisamy
Judges:
05 June, 2017·It is represented that the order, which is the subject matter of this Contempt Petition, has been complied with by the respondent, vide order dated 31.03.2017 in Pa.Mu.No.537/Aa2/2017, which is taken on file and recorded.2. In the light the above, this Contempt Petition is closed 05.06.2017 Index : ...
Madras High Court
Pandi @ Paulpandi vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
05 June, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.) This petition has been filed by the petitioner to produce the petitioner's daughter/detenu namely, Muthu, D/o.Pandi @ Paulpandi, aged about 17 years.2.The matter was referred to the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, attached to this ben...
Madras High Court
Srimathi vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Police Central Crime Branch And Others
Judges: R Mahadevan
05 June, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.06.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Crl.O.P.No.15750 of 2015 Srimathi ... Petitioner Vs State represented by1. The Deputy Commissioner of Police Central Crime Branch, Egmore, Chennai.2. The Inspector of Po...
Madras High Court
K.Nallappan vs The Chairman
Judges:
05 June, 2017·Seeking a direction to the respondents to restore the electricity supply in Service No.107-023-385 at Door No.110, Audiappa Naicken Street, Chennai 79, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for ...
Madras High Court
K.Chinnappan vs Kannammal
Judges:
05 June, 2017·It is represented by the learned counsel for the appellant that the matter has been settled between the parties,which has been endorsed by the learned counsel for the respondent. The learned counsel for the appellant has made endorsement on the grounds of appeal to that effect. In view of the same, ...
Madras High Court
P.Sethuramalingam vs S.Periyasamy
Judges:
05 June, 2017·It is seen that this petitioner is facing the prosecution for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in STC No.249 of 2016 before the Judicial Magistrate, No.I, Karur. Admittedly, the petitioner appeared before the trial Court for the first hearing on 24.03.2016 and had engag...
Madras High Court
A.Basith vs Ishrathmubeen
Judges:
05 June, 2017·This revision arises against the order of learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Erode, passed in C.M.P.No.175 of 2016 in C.A.No.27 of 2016 on 06.02.2017.2. Petitioner and respondent are husband and wife. They have two children. Differences arose between them. Respondent/wife initiated pr...
Madras High Court
The United India Insurance ... vs Kannaki
Judges:
05 June, 2017·(Judgment of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.) United India Insurance Company has challenged the judgment and decree, dated 07.09.2016, made in M.C.O.P.No.725 of 2013, by which, compensation of Rs.13,00,000/- has been awarded, for the death of one M.Elangovan. Claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.725 o...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.