S.Sudha vs Balakrishnan
Judges:
05 June, 2017·The wife who is the respondent in H.M.O.P.No.18 of 2017 filed by the husband seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty, seeks transfer of the said proceedings to the file of Sub-Court, Virudhunagar.2.In the affidavit filed in support of the Transfer petition, it is stated that the wife is living in S...
Madras High Court
Karuppaswamy [ vs The Regional Passport Officer Regional Passport Office Corporation Commercial Complex Opp Thandumariamman Koil Avinashi Road
Judges: M Duraiswamy
05 June, 2017·Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.N.Vijaya Baskar, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.2. The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a Writ of mandamus directing the respondent to entertain his fresh passport appl...
Madras High Court
D Veerasamy vs The Sub Inspector Of Police
Judges: R Mahadevan
05 June, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.R.MAHADEVAN, J., sr 2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.05.06...
Madras High Court
The President The Nilgiris District Teachers Cooperative Thrift & Credit Society No J 333 vs The Joint Director Office Of The Director Of Cooperative Audit And Others
Judges: D Krishnakumar
05 June, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.16657 of 2013 and M.P. No. 1 of 2013 The President The Nilgiris District Teachers Cooperative Thrift & Credit Society No.J.333 .. Petitioner vs.1. The Joint Director Office of the Director of Cooperative Audit, Slum Clearance Board Kamaraj...
Madras High Court
The Chairman vs The Tn Dr.M.G.R. Medical ...
Judges:
05 June, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has circulated a letter dated 01.06.2017, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ petition. Accordingly, the matter appeared today under the caption ?for withdrawal? and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.In view of the sa...
Madras High Court
Jeyapushpam vs The State Rep. By
Judges:
05 June, 2017·both petitions Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records relating to chargesheet in C.C.No.255 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.I, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District.These are the 2nd quash applications. Earlier, the ...
Madras High Court
Arulmighu Muthu Vinayagar @ Mottai Vinayagar Temple Rep By Its Executive Officer B Nandhakumar Avalurpettai vs The District Collector And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
05 June, 2017·The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to conduct weekly Shanday on Wednesday of every week or on any other day of the week based on the petitioner's representation dated 10.02.2017.2. According to the petitione...
Madras High Court
Maniyarasu [ ] vs State : Rep By The Inspector Of Police
Judges: R Mahadevan
05 June, 2017·The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(r) and (s) and 3(2) (v a) of SC/ST (POA) Amendment Act, 2015 r/w 324 and 506(i) IPC.2. Mr.M. Mohamed Riyaz, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) takes notice for the respondent.3. Heard both sides.4....
Madras High Court
B Sesha Sainathan vs The Joint Commissioner Of Police And Others
Judges: R Mahadevan
05 June, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.06.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Crl.O.P.No.18573 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 B.Sesha Sainathan ... Petitioner Vs State represented by1. The Joint Commissioner of Police, Ambattur, Chennai.2. The Inspector o...
Madras High Court
A.Mohammed Atham vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
05 June, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus directing the fourth respondent to demolish the illegal, unlawful, and unauthorised multi-storied construction put up by the 6th respondent in T.S.No.5 of Shanmug...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.