S.Ramani vs P.N.Balaji
Judges:
06 June, 2017·When the matter came up for hearing on 17.04.2017, there was no representation for the appellants and hence, Registry was directed to list the matter for dismissal on 20.04.2017. On R.SUBBIAH.J, and M.S.RAMESH.J, DP 20.04.2017, on the request of the learned counsel for the appellants, the matter w...
Madras High Court
Ramakrishnan vs The Special Sub Inspector Of ...
Judges:
06 June, 2017·On the complaint lodged by Usha Nandhini, Tahsildar, the respondent police have registered a case in Crime No.50 of 2017 on 29.04.2017 under Sections 147, 294(b) and 332 IPC against Ramakrishnan and four others. Challenging which, the accused are before this Court.2. Heard the learned counsel for th...
Madras High Court
Karthikeyeni vs The Commissioner Of Police
Judges:
06 June, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.To1.The Additional...
Madras High Court
W.P.No.12506 Of 2017 vs The Commissioner
Judges:
06 June, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought the permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is c...
Madras High Court
Balaji Singh vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
06 June, 2017·With the consent of the learned counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner sought for compensation for an extent of land which has been left out with the extent of 75 sq.mt, in the property bearing Old Survey Numbers 178/2F, Ward-E, Block-11,...
Madras High Court
H.C.P.No.741 Of 2017 vs The State
Judges:
06 June, 2017·K.K. Sasidharan, J.Counsels:For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: D. Geetha For Respondents/Defendant: AR.L. Sundaresan, Senior Counsel for S. Madhan Kumar Subject: Civil Catch Words Mentioned IN Acts/Rules/Orders:Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) - Order IX Rule 13; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (C...
Madras High Court
M.Gopal vs The Commander Works Engineer
Judges:
06 June, 2017·This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the office order No.132 dated 03.09.2013 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to effect any recovery from petitioners' sala...
Madras High Court
D.Devadas vs The General Manager
Judges:
06 June, 2017·The petitioner was employed as technician in the respondents Corporation and he retired from service on 31.08.2015, on reaching the age of superannuation.2.He has filed this writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents to pay the retirement benefits.3.The First Bench of this Court in sim...
Madras High Court
S.Chinna Kannan vs The District Collector
Judges:
06 June, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Heard Mr.M.P.Senthil, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.V.Muruganantham, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the 1st respondent, Mr.S.Sethuraman,learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent and Mr.R.Muru...
Madras High Court
M.Maniamuthu vs The Additional Chief Secretary ...
Judges:
06 June, 2017·This Writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent i.e., the Additional Chief Secretary and Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Chennai to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representati...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.