G.Neelamegam vs 3 Union Bank Of India
Judges:
16 June, 2017·The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings dated 12.10.2015, on the file of the 2nd respondent and also the proceedings dated 08.10.2015, on the file of the 3rd respondent and the proceedings dated 1...
Madras High Court
S Shivaprakasham vs E Sundaravalli
Judges: Huluvadi G Ramesh, M V Muralidaran
16 June, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.6.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G.RAMESH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN Contempt Petition No.304 of 2017 S.Shivaprakasham .. Petitioner Vs.E.Sundaravalli, IAS The District Collector cum Inspector of Panch...
Madras High Court
And Connected Miscellaneous S M/S Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs Sugarani And Others
Judges: S Manikumar, M Govindaraj
16 June, 2017·THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ C.M.A.Nos.2814, 2839 and 2840 of 2017 and connected Miscellaneous Petitions M/s.Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai. .. Appellant in CMA.2814/16 /2nd Respondent in CMA.Nos.2839 & 2840/16 vs.1. Sugarani2. Minor S...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs The Sub Collector
Judges:
16 June, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by R. SUBBIAH,J.) The present writ petition has been filed to quash the order bearing No. Na.Ka. 1461/2016/D dated 16.06.2017 passed by the respondent and to direct the respondent to declare that the petitioner belongs to Kurumans (Scheduled Tribe) community.2. The case ...
Madras High Court
K Ravikumar vs The Chairman And Others
Judges: K Kalyanasundaram
16 June, 2017·The petitioner has filed this writ petition to call for all the relevant records relating to the impugned circular No.PRNL/60/2002-03, dated 15.11.2002 issued by the 1st respondent herein and quash the impugned order in respect of 3rd respondent herein alone as the same is arbitrary, unreasonable, i...
Madras High Court
V Saravanan Gurukal vs The Commissioner Of Police And Others
Judges: V Parthiban
16 June, 2017·Seeking a direction to the respondent police to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 18.4.2017, the petitioner has come up with this petition.V.PARTHIBAN,J.msk2. Heard the learned counsel on either side and also perused the records carefully.3. A perusal of the complaint would go...
Madras High Court
Lebara Hotels Pvt Ltd Formerly M/S Lbr Leisure And Hospitality Services Private Limited Old No 228 vs M Sasikala Joint Sub Registrar Chennai Central Bharathi Salai Chennai 018 And Others
Judges: Huluvadi G Ramesh, M V Muralidaran
16 June, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.6.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G.RAMESH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN Contempt Petition No.241 of 2017 Lebara Hotels Pvt Ltd Formerly M/s. LBR Leisure and Hospitality Services Private Limited Old No.228, New No.302 F.M. H...
Madras High Court
M.Anusuya vs P.Thangavelu
Judges:
16 June, 2017·This petition is filed to withdraw and transfer HMOP.No.367 of 2015 pending on the file of Sub Court, Poonamallee to be tried along with O.P.No.1442 of 2015 pending on the file of III Additional Family Court at Chennai.2. The petitioner is the wife and respondent is the husband. The marriage between...
Madras High Court
D Santha vs The Registrar Of Co Operative Societies ( Housing ) No 493 And Others
Judges: D Krishnakumar
16 June, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.06.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.15144 of 2017 D. Santha ..Petitioner Vs.1. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies (Housing) No.493, Anna Salai, (TNHEB) Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.2. The Deput...
Madras High Court
Dr T Sadagopan vs The Tamil Nadu Medical Council Rep By Its Registrar And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
16 June, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in both the Writ Petitions sought the permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petitions and has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.In view of the same, the Writ Petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.