M.Natesa Chettiyar vs The Joint Commissioner
Judges:
20 June, 2017·The petitioner is now 93 years old. He filed the present writ petition challenging the order of the third respondent dated 31.03.2015, wherein and whereby, the property belonging to the petitioner was attached thereby creating encumbrance at the office of the fourth respondent.2. Heard both sides.3....
Madras High Court
M.Sundararaj vs S.Radhika
Judges:
20 June, 2017·(Judgment of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH.J,) Challenging the present appeal, is against an interim order directing the appellant/husband to pay a sum of Rs.4000/- to the respondent towards an interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.2.The brief facts of the case are as fol...
Madras High Court
M/S Sam Turbo Industries Limited Represented By Its Join Managing Director vs The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Rep By Its Chairman No 144 And Others
Judges: K K Sasidharan, M V Muralidaran
20 June, 2017·THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN W.A. No. 2211 of 2010 and MP.No.1 of 2010 M/s.Sam Turbo Industries Limited Represented by its Join Managing Director, Mr.S.K.Senthil Kumar Avanashi Road, Neelambur Coimbatore – 641 062. ...Appellant V...
Madras High Court
Union Of India Rep By The Chief Post Master General Tamil Nadu Circle Anna Salai And Others vs V Rathinam And Others
Judges: K K Sasidharan, M V Muralidaran
20 June, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V. MURALIDARAN W.P. No. 4055 of 2017 and WMP No.4202 of 20171. Union of India rep. by the Chief Post Master General Tamil Nadu Circle Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.2. The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices Madurai Division Mad...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs Paramaguru
Judges:
20 June, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.In view of the above endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, conne...
Madras High Court
K Devanesan In Both vs Director General Of Police And Others
Judges: M V Muralidaran
20 June, 2017·Both these Criminal Original Petitions were filed to order to exhume the buried body of petitioner's deceased son Jayakumar@Kutty and to conduct Re-Post Mortem examination on the corpse by a newly constituted panel of doctor team relating to a case in Crime No.442 of 2012 on the file of E9 Inspector...
Madras High Court
M/S.Sharon Solutions India ... vs The Principal Commissioner Of ...
Judges:
20 June, 2017·There is no representation for the petitioner. However, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, based on instruction, submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous in view of the order-in-original passed on 06.06.2017, wherein the request of the petitio...
Madras High Court
S.Ethirajulu vs The District Collector
Judges:
20 June, 2017·The petitioner made a representation on 05.04.2016 interalia alleging that a larger extent has been acquired with an extent of 2.2 cents in Survey No.509/2 though the same has not been included in the acquisition proceedings and therefore, compensation will have to be determined for the same as well...
Madras High Court
N.Suresh vs Tmt.Karukuzhali
Judges:
20 June, 2017·Mr.K.V.Dhanapalan, learned Special Government Pleader represented that the order, which is the subject matter of contempt, has been complied with vide proceedings dated 16.06.2017 in Rc.No.286/2015(B3) passed by the District Revenue Officer, Thiruvallur. He has produced a copy of the said proceeding...
Madras High Court
A.S.Kotteswaran vs Greater Chennai Corporation
Judges:
20 June, 2017·The petitioner has come to this Court seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to receive and process his pension application without reference to the pendency of the civil suit filed by his first wife, who also executed an agreement on 25.10.85 to leave the petitioner and...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.