Aandiammal vs The Joint Registrar ...
Judges:
25 July, 2017·i) The petitioner is directed to pay a sum of Rs.20,000/- to the third respondent society on or before 26.07.2017, 10.30 a.m.ii) As per the undertaking given by the petitioner, she shall pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month to the third respondent society on or before 5th Day of every succeeding month...
Madras High Court
M.Jaychitra vs State Represented By
Judges:
25 July, 2017·This petition is filed seeking for a direction to the respondent to register a case on the basis of a complaint given by the petitioner dated 09.09.2016.2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the first respondent.3.Th...
Madras High Court
R.Thayalan vs Dharmaraj
Judges:
25 July, 2017·This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to expedite the disposal of the case pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, FTC at Magistrate Level, Madurai in S.T.C.No.270 of 2015 within a time frame.2. Heard Mr.R.Venkatesan, learned counsel ...
Madras High Court
Ms.T.V.Manimekalai vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
25 July, 2017·Challenging the land acquisition proceedings and the award dated 23.01.1998, the present Writ petitions have been filed.2. The case of the petitioners is that the third petitioner has purchased the land by sale deed dated 23.06.1989 from one Palaniammal and it was approved layout in favour of Mr.Yas...
Madras High Court
A.Paraman vs Pitchaivel
Judges:
25 July, 2017·Seeking for a direction from this Court to the Lower Court for speedy disposal of O.S.No.686 of 2015, the present civil revision petition has been preferred by the revision petitioner / plaintiff invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India.2. However, considering the materials placed before th...
Madras High Court
Om Prakash Lal vs The Tahsildar
Judges:
25 July, 2017·Mr.S.Marimuthu, learned counsel representing Mr.M.A.Abdulwahab, learned counsel, is present on behalf of the writ petitioner. There is no representation for the respondents. Both the respondents are official respondents.2 The writ petition is one assailing a communication dated 14.8.2004 from the fi...
Madras High Court
Chokkalingam vs The Deputy Superintendent Of ...
Judges:
25 July, 2017·When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition apart from sending a letter to the Registry to list the matter under the caption 'for withdrawal'. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the ...
Madras High Court
N.Kalaivasan vs The Executive Director
Judges:
25 July, 2017·The petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition seeking to quash the proceedings of the 2nd respondent herein vide Ref.No.CHKP:09, dated 20.05.2013 and for a direction to the 2nd respondent herein to issue letter of intent to him.2. According to the petitioner, he applied for LPG Distributorship ...
Madras High Court
A.Selvaraj vs The Principal Commissioner Of
Judges:
25 July, 2017·Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice for the respondents. Heard both. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order passed by the first respondent dated 22.3.2017, by which, the first respondent rejected the petitio...
Madras High Court
P.Sivakumar vs S.Uma Muthumari
Judges:
25 July, 2017·1. This Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal has been filed, to set aside the judgement and decree, dated 25.07.2017, made in HMCMA.No.25 of 2015, by the IV Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli, confirming the judgement and decree, dated 20.04.2015, made in HMOP.No.96 of 2014, passed by the Subordina...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.