S.Manoharan vs S.Ravindran
Judges:
04 January, 2017·The revision petition is filed by the defendants 1 and 2 challenging the order refusing to transpose the defendants 4,6 and 7 as plaintiffs 2 to 4 in a suit filed by the plaintiff for relief of partition against seven defendants.2. The case is at the stage of trial and the examination of P.W.1. has ...
Madras High Court
Ariyathambi @ Ramasamy ... 1St ... vs Pappathi
Judges:
04 January, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the sole appellant died in the year 2013 and on 16.12.2013, he sent a letter to the appellant's address in order to get instructions with regard to impleadment of legal representatives, but the same was returned with an endorsement ?Addr...
Madras High Court
P.L.S.Senthil Arumugam vs State Rep. By
Judges:
04 January, 2017·It is represented by both sides that the petitioner has passed away. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor filed death certificate also.2.In view of the above, this criminal original original petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed....
Madras High Court
Metropolitan Transport ... vs Mrs. Kannammal
Judges:
04 January, 2017·The Transport Corporation has filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, challenging the Judgment and Decree dated 25.07.2005 made in M.C.O.P.No.5306 of 2000 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (V Judge, Small Causes Court) Chennai, which is pending in SR stage from the year 2005 onwards, ...
Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs R. Vanjinathan
Judges:
04 January, 2017·The Transport Corporation has filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, challenging the Judgment and Decree dated 29.09.2009 made in M.C.O.P.No.714 of 2006 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in the II Court of Small Causes, Chennai, which is pending in SR stage from the year 2011 onwards...
Madras High Court
R.Suresh vs The Presiding Officer
Judges:
04 January, 2017·(made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.) Order impugned in the instant writ petition is as follows:Counsel for both sides present. Conditional order passed not complied and hence stay is vacated.I.A.No.730/16 is filed for extension of time for payment. The reason given by the petitioner for extension of time for p...
Madras High Court
S.Sheik Sardar vs T.Veerapandian
Judges:
04 January, 2017·Cases Common Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent for having willfully and deliberately disobeyed the orders of this Court passed in W.P(MD)No.2716 of 2013 and W.P(MD)No.15353 of 2012, dated 27.03.2014 and for having committed c...
Madras High Court
Azhwar vs The Managing Director
Judges:
04 January, 2017·This writ petition has been filed praying to quash the letter Ref.No. Se.Mu. No.976/02/D/Ae.Aa dated 07.09.2009 and the demand notice issued in February 2010 issued by the second respondent and to direct the respondents to receive the monthly rent as per the terms of allotment i.e. 10% increase, eve...
Madras High Court
K.Panchavarnam vs P.Shahul Hameed
Judges:
04 January, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the dismissal of I.A.No.639 of 2006 in O.S.No.949 of 2002 dated 8.12.2006 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Madurai.2. The case of the petitioners is that the respondent herein filed O.S.No.919 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif...
Madras High Court
Sekar @ Japan Sekar vs State Rep. By
Judges:
04 January, 2017·When the matter is listed under the caption either for disposal or for dismissal, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Therefore, this criminal original petition is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.To1.The Judicial Magistrate No.1, ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.