Mrs.S.Mercy Selvamani vs Mr.J.Sampath
Judges:
10 January, 2017·The respondent-husband has filed F.C.O.P.No.145 of 2016 under Section 32 of the Divorce Act, before the Family Court, Vellore, for restitution of conjugal rights. The petitioner-wife is a School Nurse in St.Joseph's Residential School and residing in Sriperumbudhur. The said O.P. is filed by the hus...
Madras High Court
Thirumurugan vs The Tahsildar
Judges:
10 January, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the notice dated 16.11.2011 passed in Pa.Ve.A7/26/2011 by the respondent and quash the same, by way of issuing a writ of certiorarifi...
Madras High Court
S.Manickam vs D.Palanisamy
Judges:
10 January, 2017·Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this revision and has also made an endorsement to that effect. C.T. SELVAM, J gm2. Recording the said endorsement, this Criminal Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. However, considering the facts and circumstances, this Court ...
Madras High Court
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs Kamaleswari
Judges:
10 January, 2017·The Insurance Company which is arrayed as the second respondent before the Tribunal has challenged the award on the ground that there was no policy cover for the vehicle at the time when the accident took place.2. On 17.10.1997 at about 8.45 hours, while the claimant was travelling as a pillion ride...
Madras High Court
Maragatham vs Pusha
Judges:
10 January, 2017·This revision has been filed by the petitioners against the order dated 19.1.2011 made in I.A.No.414 of 2008 in O.S.No.127 of 1987 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Udumalpet. The revision petitioners are the legal heirs of the third defendant.2. The original plaintiff Iyyappan had filed the sui...
Madras High Court
M/S.Lason India Private Limited vs Mr.Pradeep Nevatia
Judges:
10 January, 2017·There is no representation on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant, either in person or through the counsel on record. Hence, the suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.10.01.2017.tsh CS.No.30 of 2007 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
V.Jegan Varghese vs Mary Vergin
Judges:
10 January, 2017·As per the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this criminal original petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.To1.The Judicial Magistrate, Padmanabapuram. ...
Madras High Court
Dhanalakshmi vs Deivanai Ammal
Judges:
10 January, 2017·Earlier it was represented that steps have to be taken to bring on record the legal representatives of some of the deceased respondents. However subsequently, the learned counsel for the appellant who has filed Vakalath reported that he had handed over the bundle to the parties and requested this Co...
Madras High Court
M/S.Eastern Alloys Castings Pvt ... vs M/S.Iic Container Line Pvt Ltd
Judges:
10 January, 2017·There is no representation on behalf of the plaintiffs. The learned counsel for the first defendant represented that plaintiffs filed proof affidavit on 09.03.2015. Thereafter, the plaintiffs have not turned up before the Court, the adjudication proceedings before the Additional Master-III, reveals ...
Madras High Court
V.K.Murugiah vs The Joint Commissioner
Judges:
10 January, 2017·Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition stating that the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has made an endorsement to that effect. Recording the same, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Cons...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.