Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.Manickam vs D.Palanisamy

Madras High Court|10 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this revision and has also made an endorsement to that effect. C.T. SELVAM, J gm
2. Recording the said endorsement, this Criminal Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. However, considering the facts and circumstances, this Court directs the trial Court to dispense with the personal appearance of petitioner before it, upon his swearing to an affidavit informing his address for service, that he duly would be represented by his counsel on all hearing dates, that he would, at no instance, dispute his identity and that, he would appear before the trial court as and when required. Upon the petitioner doing so, the trial court may seek the presence of petitioner before it, solely on the important hearing dates. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 10.01.2017 Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no gm To The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Paramathy.
Crl.R.C.No.39 of 2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.Manickam vs D.Palanisamy

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
10 January, 2017