Sasireka vs K.Mughilan
Judges:
24 January, 2017·Originally, the respondent-husband has filed H.M.O.P.No.51 of 2012 under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act before the Subordinate Court, Ponneri and Tr.C.M.P.No.703 of 2012 was filed by the wife before this Court and while the same was pending, the husband had filed PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J srn H.M...
Madras High Court
M/S.Associate Arts Enterprises vs The Commissioner
Judges:
24 January, 2017·The factual matrix of the case is as under:The petitioner - Associate Arts Enterprises is into the business of erecting advertisement hoardings in the City of Chennai. The Corporation of Chennai, by the impugned demand notice dated 23.10.2002, called upon the petitioner to pay the tax on advertiseme...
Madras High Court
L.Dhatchinamoorthy vs B.Shankar
Judges:
24 January, 2017·The petitioners/defendants have filed this revision seeking direction for early disposal of the suit in O.S.No.58 of 2012 on the file of District Munsif Court, Ponneri.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have filed the written statement as early as ...
Madras High Court
G.Manokaran vs K.Thirukumaran
Judges:
24 January, 2017·The plaintiff, who suffered a decree in a suit for specific performance, is the appellant herein, seeks to set aside the same, based upon the following substantial questions of law:-(i) Whether the courts below are correct in holding that the agreement marked as Ex.A1 is invalid while it is abundan...
Madras High Court
M/S Southern Finance And Investments Rep By Its Manager Mr Unnikrishnan No 193 vs Mr D Antony
Judges: V Bharathidasan
24 January, 2017·When the above Criminal Appeals were posted for hearing on 19.01.2017, there was no representation for the appellant in both the appeals. Therefore, both the Criminal Appeals were directed to be posted today for dismissal. Even today, there is no representation for the appellant in both the appeals...
Madras High Court
M/S Udaya Tv Private Limited vs The Income Tax Officer
Judges: Huluvadi G Ramesh, Anita Sumanth Tax
24 January, 2017·(Judgment of the Court was delivered by Dr.Anita Sumanth, J.,) The above Appeal is filed by the assessee and was admitted on the following substantial questions of law:-"(i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and on the evidence on record, the order of the Tribunal is not correct in ...
Madras High Court
Nageshwari vs The State Rep By The Superintendent Of Police Erode And Others
Judges: M Jaichandren, T Mathivanan
24 January, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J.] Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2.2. At this stage of the hearing for the Habeas Corpus Petition, the learned counsel a...
Madras High Court
Commissioner Of Income Tax Salary Ward vs Smt Sasikala Pan : Aaepr 6335F
Judges: Huluvadi G Ramesh, Anita Sumanth Tax
24 January, 2017·(Judgment of the Court was delivered by Dr.Anita Sumanth, J.,) The Tax Case Appeal filed by the Revenue calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated 18.2.2014 in ITA No.2083/MDS/2013, has been admitted on 13.08.2014 fo...
Madras High Court
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tiruchirapalli vs M/S Annapoorani Welfare Trust
Judges: Huluvadi G Ramesh, Anita Sumanth Tax
24 January, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.1.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G. RAMESH AND THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH Tax Case (Appeal) Nos.1432 and 1433 of 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax Tiruchirapalli. Appellant in both the cases Vs.M/s.Annapoorani We...
Madras High Court
Thameemun Ansari vs State Rep By The Inspector Of Police
Judges: S Nagamuthu, N Authinathan
24 January, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN Criminal Appeal No.741 of 2016 Prayer:- Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the learned VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chennai in S.C.No.173 of 2...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.