A.Arivazhagan vs The Registrar Of Trade Marks
Judges:
31 January, 2017·smi W.P.Nos.14789 & 15782 of 2016 31.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
M/S.Sreenivas Build Tech (India) vs Government Of Puducherry
Judges:
31 January, 2017·gg W.P.Nos.8589 to 8591 of 2015, 13632 and 13633 of 2016, and 553 of 2017 31.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
Muniammal vs Alameluammal
Judges:
31 January, 2017·mmi S.A.Nos.1023 and 1024 of 2004 31.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
V.Mangalakshmi vs Selvam
Judges:
31 January, 2017·vs CRP(PD)Nos.1111 and 1112 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2013 31.01.2017...
Madras High Court
Kamalesh Kumar Rathore vs S.Devaraj
Judges:
31 January, 2017·vs C.R.P.(PD) Nos.2213 and 2214 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2013 31.01.2017...
Madras High Court
S.Ragunath vs 4 Amrita Vidyalayam School
Judges:
31 January, 2017·Petitioner has come up with the present writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to initiate action against the 4th respondent for not prescribing CBSE Syllabus books and collecting excess amount for books notebooks and uniform and to permit the students to buy books...
Madras High Court
Rajangam vs Muthu Gounder
Judges:
31 January, 2017·The appellants are the plaintiffs. The suit has been filed seeking permanent injunction on the promise that they are in possession and enjoyment of the Government Property. Though originally impleaded three defendants alone as parties thereafter, the revenue official viz., Tahsildar, Uthangarai, was...
Madras High Court
Rajangam vs Muthu Gounder
Judges:
31 January, 2017·The appellants are the plaintiffs. The suit has been filed seeking permanent injunction on the premise that they are in possession and enjoyment of the Government Property. Though, originally three defendants alone were parties to the suit, thereafter, the revenue official viz., Tahsildar, Uthangara...
Madras High Court
R.Panchapakesan vs The Commissioner
Judges:
31 January, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition. Endorsement is made.Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.(S.K.K., CJ.) (M.S., J.) 31.01.2017 Index : Yes/No Website : Yes/No sra To1.The Commissioner Punith...
Madras High Court
S.Arvind Raj vs 4 The Secretary
Judges:
31 January, 2017·This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent college to admit the petitioner S.Arvind Raj in the first year MBBS course for the academic year 2014-2015.2. Today, when the writ petition is taken up for hearing, leanred counsel for the third respondent po...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.