M.Sinnaiah vs The General Manager
Judges:
24 February, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.P.Kannan Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.2 The petitioner joined the services of the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation as a Driver on 12.05.1987 [Staff No.JO 3774] and at the time of retirement o...
Madras High Court
M.Sharmila vs Purushothaman
Judges:
24 February, 2017·Prayer in Tr.C.M.P.No.622 of 2016:Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Proceedure Code praying to withdraw the proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.23 of 2015 pending on the file of Subordinate Judge, Padmanabhapuram and to transfer the same to any Family Court, Chennai.Prayer in Tr.C.M.P.No.623 of 201...
Madras High Court
Boomiraj vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
24 February, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to give necessary permission for conducting Adalpadal programme in the place mentioned in the petition, by way of issuing a writ of mandamu...
Madras High Court
Dr.Chetan vs Shwetha
Judges:
24 February, 2017·The trial in the O.P. has already commenced and P.W.1's evidence is in progress and it was posted for cross-examination of P.W.1. On a perusal of the docket orders of the trial Court, it is seen that the Presiding Officer has stated on 10.02.2017 as follows: "Petitioner absent. Respondent present. T...
Madras High Court
M/S.Birdy Inc vs M/S.Technopak Advisors Pvt. Ltd
Judges:
24 February, 2017·This petition has been filed seeking to appoint an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes arisen between the petitioner and the respondent.2. The parties have entered into a Hire Purchase Agreement dated 01.10.2014 containing Clause 30 as arbitration clause, which reads as under:-30. If any dis...
Madras High Court
E.K.Gopal vs The General Manager
Judges:
24 February, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.P.Kannan Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.2 The petitioner joined the services of the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation as a Conductor on 21.03.1981 [Staff No.JO 5075] and at the time of retiremen...
Madras High Court
) A.Asokan vs S.Kasturi
Judges:
24 February, 2017·The defendants in O.S.No.59 of 2010, on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Thiruvannamalai, are the revision petitioners herein. The plaintiff, viz., first respondent herein has filed the said suit for the relief of partition and separate possession. During the pendency of the suit, the p...
Madras High Court
R.Supriya vs Indian Council For Agricultural ...
Judges:
24 February, 2017·When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent submitted that the matter has been settled out of court and in support of this plea, he produced a letter dated 23.2.2017 addressed by the Tamil Nadu Board of Rural Development to Mrs.N.G.Kalaiselvi, Advocate, where...
Madras High Court
S.P.Munisamy vs The Director Of Pension
Judges:
24 February, 2017·By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.2.The petitioner retired from service as High School Headmaster on 31.10.2004 and drawing pension, vide Pension Payment Order No.C177332/EDJ and he is also a subscriber of the Tamil Nadu Pensioners Health Fund Scheme and a sum of Rs.75/- ...
Madras High Court
Gabriel vs Kamala
Judges:
24 February, 2017·The respondent filed a Suit in O.S.No.31 of 2012, for recovery of money and the Revision Petitioner who is the defendant in the Suit has filed his written statement in the Suit. After the filing of the written statement, the revision petitioner/defendant filed an Interlocutory Application, seeking p...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.