T K Subramaniam And Others vs Rukmani
Judges: M V Muralidaran
20 February, 2017·The appellants are the petitioners before this Court, challenging the order in I.A.No.116 of 2012 in unnumbered appeal dated 17.09.2012 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Coimbatore.2. The case of the respondent/plaintiff is that he has filed the suit in O.S.No.43 of 2008 bef...
Madras High Court
J.Lenin vs The Government Of Tamilnadu
Judges:
20 February, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by the Acting Chief Justice) The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the 11th Respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.02.2017 given by the General Public Friends association and devotees of Rani...
Madras High Court
A Jalal vs The Commissioner Corporation Of Chennai Rippon Buildings Chennai – 600 003 And Others
Judges: Huluvadi G Ramesh, R Mahadevan
20 February, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.02.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.HULUVADI G.RAMESH, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.4143 of 2017 A.Jalal .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Rippon Buildings Chennai –...
Madras High Court
The Management vs The Presiding Officer And Others
Judges: D Krishnakumar
20 February, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.01.2019 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR WP. No.2909 of 2011 and MP. No.1 of 2011 and MP. No.1 of 2012 The Management, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., No.27, Railway Station New Road, Kumbakonam – 612 001, Re...
Madras High Court
Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai vs M/S Latham India Ltd Aarthi Chambers 189
Judges: Huluvadi G Ramesh, The Acting, Anita Sumanth Tax
20 February, 2017·(Delivered by the Acting Chief Justice) The Tax Case Appeal filed by the Revenue calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai, dated 10.02.2005 in ITA No.797 of 1999, has been admitted on 28.9.2005 for consideration of the f...
Madras High Court
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai vs T R Sabhari Babu
Judges: Huluvadi G Ramesh, The Acting, Anita Sumanth Tax
20 February, 2017·(Delivered by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice) The Tax Case Appeal filed by the Revenue calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench, Chennai, dated 23.11.2006 in IT(SS)A No.120/Mds/2001, has been admitted on 21.8.2008 for considerat...
Madras High Court
M Selvaraj vs State By The Deputy Superintendent Of Police
Judges: V Bharathidasan
20 February, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.A.No.724 of 2008 M.Selvaraj ... Appellant Vs State by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kudimangalam Police Station, Udumalpet.(Crime No.346 of 2007) ... Respondent Criminal appeal preferred under Section 374(2) ...
Madras High Court
M/S Chinthamani Foods & Feeds ( P ) Ltd vs D Chandrasekar
Judges: V Bharathidasan
20 February, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Criminal Appeal No.229 of 2007 and Crl.M.P.No.1610 of 2016 M/s.Chinthamani Foods & Feeds (P) Ltd., Managing Director, K.Palaniappa Mudaliar, S/o. Kuppusamy Mudaliar, Mettupatti, Salem – 636110. rep. by its Power of Attorney R.Murugan, S/o.P.Raju, Accountant,...
Madras High Court
Selvi @ Gowri Selvi vs C.Manikandan
Judges:
20 February, 2017·This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to withdraw the proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.136 of 2016 on the file of the Sub Court, Pudukkottai and transfer the same to any other competent Court at Tiruchirappalli.2. On an earlier occasion, neither the petitioner nor Mr.R.Sundar Sr...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By
Judges:
20 February, 2017·By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. Mr.K. Dhananjayan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the 1st respondent and Mr.P. Kannan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent.3. The petitioner was appoi...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.