The Managing Director vs Seetha Lakshmi And Others
Judges: N Kirubakaran
03 April, 2017·This appeal has been preferred by the Transport Corporation against the award of Rs.10,77,800/- for the death of one Chenthamizh Selvan aged about 44 years, an non-mazdoor staff in PWD earning about Rs.7,000/-per month in an accident occurred on 31.10.2012, when he was knocked down by the bus belon...
Madras High Court
S Pappathi [ vs The District Collector O/O The District Collectorate Namakkal Namakkal District 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer District Collectorate Namakkal District 3 Tahsildar Senthamangalam Talu Namakkal District [ ,The Tahsildar Senthamangalam Talu Namakkal District [
Judges: M Duraiswamy
03 April, 2017·Mr.R.S.Selvam, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents.2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.3. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider...
Madras High Court
M Gopal [ vs The Tahsildar Palacode Dharmapuri District 2 The Land Surveyor Office Of The Tahsildar Palacode Dharmapuri District 3 The Inspector Of Police Palacode Police Station Palacode Dharmapuri District
Judges: M Duraiswamy
03 April, 2017·Mr.R.S.Selvam, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents.2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.3. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to ...
Madras High Court
K Pechimuthu vs The Tahsildar And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
03 April, 2017·The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to grant permission by levying Cart Track Tax for the pipeline through S.F.No.456 to take water to Survey Nos.457/1A etc., Chettiyakkapalayam Village, Kinathukadavu Taluk, Coimbatore Distri...
Madras High Court
M/S Karthikaa Corporation Rep By Its Proprietor P Jaya vs The Secretary Micro Small Medium Enterprises Department ( Msme Department ) Secretariat And Others
Judges: D Krishnakumar
03 April, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMARW.P. No. 28669 of 2016 and W.M.P. No.24783 of 2016 M/s Karthikaa Corporation rep. By its Proprietor P. Jaya .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Secretary Micro Small Medium Enterprises Department (MSME Department) Secretariat, Fort St.Geroge Che...
Madras High Court
Pr Arthur Devasingh vs Employees Provident Fund Commissioner And Others
Judges: K K Sasidharan, M V Muralidaran
03 April, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.04.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN W.P.No.484 of 2017 and W.M.P.Nos.518 and 519 of 2017 Pr.Arthur Devasingh ... Petitioner Vs.1. Employees Provident Fund Comm...
Madras High Court
R.Padmanabhan vs The Home Secretary
Judges:
03 April, 2017·It is seen that this petitioner is having some disputes with one Thenappan Chettiyar and others with regard to certain properties and that the petitioner has sent a representation dated 17.03.2017 through registered post to the respondents herein and thereafter, filed this petition for CBI enquiry a...
Madras High Court
E Valliammal And Others vs R Ravichandran And Others
Judges: M V Muralidaran
03 April, 2017·All these Civil Revision Petitions are arising out of Common Judgment made in R.C.O.Ps and R.C.As. Therefore Common Order is delivered in these Civil Revision Petitions. Out of three Civil Revision Petitions, two revision petitions are filed by the respective tenants and the respondents 2 to 4 in th...
Madras High Court
)Krishnan vs )Thiruvanatha Perumal Nadar
Judges:
03 April, 2017·The petitioners are judgment debtors in E.P.No.84/06 in O.S.No.777/79. Aggrieved by the order passed in E.P.No.84 of 2006 in O.S.No.777 of 1979, dated 09.08.2011, the present revision petition is filed with the delay of 1150 days.2.The learned counsel for the revision petitioners submitted that the ...
Madras High Court
Anthony Das vs K.Kothandaraman
Judges:
03 April, 2017·None appears on behalf of the petitioner and respondent. The civil revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.03.04.2017 Gms/ASI K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.Gms/ASI To1. VII Small Causes Court, Chennai2. XII Small Causes Court, Chennai...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.